About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

31 Int'l J. Comp. Lab. L. & Indus. Rel. 27 (2015)
Role of Mandatory ADR and Agency Engagement in Resolving Employment Discrimination Complaints: An Australian Perspective, The

handle is hein.kluwer/cllir0031 and id is 31 raw text is: 







     The Role of Mandatory ADR and Agency
         Engagement in Resolving Employment
       Discrimination Complaints: An Australian
                                Perspective


                             Therese MACDERMOTT*

     Many jurisdictions strggle with the challenrge of hou to make their processes accessible, fair,
     and cost-effective when dealing with employment discrimination complaints. This article
     examines this problem from an Australian perspective, in the light of comparable arrangements
     and recent legislative initiatives in the United Kingdom. Much tf the emphasis has been on
     the implementation of mandatory Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes. While
     critiquing the 'atekeeping' role of ADR processes in this context, this article contends that the
     engayement by human rights and other agencies, and the advice and assistance made available
     to individuals, is of equal importance in facilitating the resolution of employment
     discrimination complaints.

1 INTRODUCTION

This article examines the institutional structures and practices involved in
resolving employment discrimination complaints in Australia, and evaluates them
against comparable arrangements and recent legislative initiatives in the United
Kingdom (UK). The two jurisdictions share a common aspiration to establish
accessible, fair, and cost-effective mechanisms for dealing with employment-based
discrimination complaints, but struggle with how best to implement this in
practice. This article assesses the impact of the fragmentation of the Australian
system into multiple pathways, and contrasts this with the employment tribunal
focus of the UK system. It also analyses the place of mandatory Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR) as a precursor to court or tribunal proceedings in
each jurisdiction. While this has been a long-standing feature since the inception
of the Australian conciliation and arbitration system, this 'gatekeeping' function is
increasingly being questioned. As from May 2014, UK Employment Tribunal
claims are not accepted without evidence of a prior referral to the Advisory
Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) and the issuing of a conciliation

    Macquarie Law School, Maquarie University, Australia. therese.macderinott@inq.edu.au.

MacDermott, Therese. 'The Role of Mandatory ADR and Agency Engagement in Resolving
Employment Discrimination Complaints: An Australian Perspective'. Thie International Journal qf
Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relitions 31, no. 1 (2015): 27-46.
© 2015 Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most