About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

125 W. Va. L. Rev. 725 (2022-2023)
Federal Sentencing: The Need for a New Test for the Abduction Enhancement in the Context of Robbery

handle is hein.journals/wvb125 and id is 745 raw text is: 






  FEDERAL SENTENCING: THE NEED FOR A NEW TEST FOR THE
  ABDUCTION ENHANCEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF ROBBERY

                                ABSTRACT

        The abduction enhancement applied to the crime of robbery is inherently
ambiguous;  the enhancement reads, 'abducted' means that a victim was forced
to accompany  an offender to a different location. The lack of a clear definition
for location has caused a split within the federal circuits, with some circuits
interpreting location as position and others interpreting location as place.
This has caused disproportionate sentences for similar criminal conduct within
separate circuits, creating the need for a more uniform interpretation of the
sentencing enhancement for abduction.
        This Note builds upon the work of David J. Sandefer' and proposes two
additional factors to consider during sentencing. A  clarified definition of
abduction  alone will not alleviate the confusion that has arisen when courts
attempt to interpret this section of the Guidelines. By focusing on a static
definition of  location, a  reviewing court  would   improperly focus  on
characteristics of the building robbed rather than the defendant's underlying
conduct.
        To propose  a solution, this Note presents several factors that courts
should use in assessing the applicability of the abduction enhancement. This test
seeks to balance all relevant factors implicated by a defendant's conduct by
considering the dangerousness presented to victims by relocation, the amount of
distance traveled, the dimensions of the structure robbed, and the intent of the
defendant in forcing relocation. This new test allows for a more robust system of
initial application and review of the abduction enhancement, presenting both
district and  circuit courts a more   definitive criteria for assessing the
applicability of the abduction enhancement.

I.     IN TRO DU CTION ..........................................................................726
II.    EVENTS  LEADING  TO THE PROMULGATION   OF THE SENTENCING
       G UIDELIN ES...............................................................................730
       A.  The History of Federal Sentencing......................................730
       B.  The Practical Application of the Guidelines ........................731
       C.  Recent Developments in the Federal Sentencing Process.....733


725


'    See David J. Sandefer, To Move or Not to Move, That is the Metaphysical Question, 85 U.
CHI. L. REv. 1973 (2018).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most