About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

17 W. St. U. L. Rev. 257 (1989-1990)
OOPS: An Analysis of Post-Pope Attorney Incompetency Cases for Trial and Appellate Counsel

handle is hein.journals/wsulr17 and id is 263 raw text is: WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY
LAW REVIEW
VOLUME 17                            SPRING 1990                           NUMBER 2
OOPS!: An Analysis of Post-Pope
Attorney Incompetency Cases for
Trial and Appellate Counsel
Franz E. Miller*
INTRODUCTION
The public in general - and prosecutors and law enforcement of-
ficers in particular - are not always thrilled about the role of the defense
attorney in the criminal justice system. However, they do share the de-
fense attorney's interest in competent' representation for criminal de-
fendants.2 The reason: The defendant may go free if the defense
attorney blunders.'
The legal concept that incompetent representation by defense trial
counsel can result in reversal of a conviction goes back at least 45 years.4
* J.D., University of California at Los Angeles; B.A., University of California at Los Angeles.
Mr. Miller is currently a Senior Attorney with the Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Three
in Santa Ana, California. He is a Certified Specialist in Criminal Law, and has been a trial and
appellate attorney in private practice and for the Orange County Public Defenders Office, where he
served as Training Officer.
The author would like to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Dave Swanson, Jeri Thomp-
son, Paul Madruga, and other members of the Law Review.
1. Competent and adequate and their derivatives are used interchangeably in this article,
as they are in the case law. Some cases also use the term effective. See Strickland v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984). As will be seen, the question is always whether trial counsel performed up to
the standard set forth in People v. Pope, 23 Cal. 3d 412, 590 P.2d 859, 152 Cal. Rptr. 732 (1979).
Competent and its derivatives are preferable since they imply able, a concept compatible with
the standard developed by case law. Adequate and effective could connote a satisfactory result
at trial. Since, as will be discussed below, competent counsel could make a reasonable tactical choice
which leads to conviction, the latter two terms could be misleading.
2. See Van de Kamp, The Right to Counsel: Constitutional Imperatives in Criminal Cases, 19
Loy. L.A.L. REv. 329 (1985).
3. See People v. Defore, 242 N.Y. 13, 21, 150 N.E. 585, 588 (1926) (Cardozo, J.).
4. Diggs v. Welch, 148 F.2d 667 (D.C. Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 325 U.S. 889 (1945).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most