About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

2006 Wis. L. Rev. 1275 (2006)
A Case Study of Inoperable Inventions: Why is the USPTO Patenting Pseudoscience

handle is hein.journals/wlr2006 and id is 1287 raw text is: A CASE STUDY OF INOPERABLE INVENTIONS: WHY IS THE USPTO PATENTING PSEUDOSCIENCE? DANIEL C. RISLOVE* I. Introduction .......................................................... 1276 A. The Problem of Inoperable Inventions ..................... 1276 B. Response to Arguments Against Reform .................. 1278 1. Patenting Inoperable Inventions Harms Consumers. 1279 2. Increased Scrutiny of Patents Will Not Stifle Innovation .................................................. 1281 3. Patentees Are Only Partially to Blame ................ 1282 4. The Problem is Both Legal and Institutional .......... 1283 II. The Legal Standard for Rejecting Inoperable Inventions ..... 1283 A. InoperabilIty and the Substantive Law of Utility ......... 1283 B. Procedural Law Regarding Rejection of Inoperable Inventions ...................................................... 1287 III. Law-in-Action Analysis of the Patenting Procedure ........... 1291 A. The USPTO Lacks Sufficient Institutional Expertise .... 1291 B. Reexamination Makes Inoperability Rejections Difficult 1292 IV . C ase Studies ......................................................... 1294 A. The DKL LifeGuard Patents ................................ 1294 B. The Motionless Electromagnetic Generator ........... 1299 C. The Cold Fusion Patents ..................................... 1302 D. The Puthoff Patent ............................................ 1304 V. Possible Solutions .................................................. 1306 A. Suggested Changes in the Law of Utility .................. 1307 B. Outsourcing the Examination of Difficult Patents ........ 1309 C. Opening the Reexamination Procedure to Inoperability O bjections ...................................................... 1311 V I. C onclusion ........................................................... 1312 * J.D., University of Wisconsin Law School, expected 2007; Ph.D. in Physics, University of New Mexico, 1997. The author would like to thank Katie Mason and especially Brian Kwok for their tireless efforts to suggest editorial improvements to this work.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most