About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2006 Wis. L. Rev. 291 (2006)
Multiple Dimensions of Tunnel Vision in Criminal Cases, The

handle is hein.journals/wlr2006 and id is 303 raw text is: THE MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS OF TUNNEL VISION IN
CRIMINAL CASES
KEITH A. FINDLEY* & MICHAEL S. SCOTT**
INTRODUCTION
The discovery of hundreds of wrongful convictions in the last
fifteen years has shaken up the criminal justice world. Since the advent
of postconviction DNA testing around 1990, more than 170 people
convicted of serious crimes have been exonerated by DNA, a number
off of death row, and most after serving many years in prison.1
Literally hundreds of additional exonerations in the last fifteen years
alone have been based on evidence other than DNA.2 Because DNA
evidence exists in only a small minority of all cases-and is preserved
and available for postconviction testing in an even smaller proportion of
cases-and     because   innocence     is  so   very   difficult  to  prove
postconviction without DNA, these known exonerations almost surely
reflect only the tip of a very large iceberg.3 These exonerations have
challenged the traditional assumption that the criminal justice system
does all it can to accurately determine guilt, and that erroneous
conviction of the innocent is, as the Supreme Court has assumed,
*     Clinical Professor, University of Wisconsin Law School; Co-Director,
Wisconsin Innocence Project. J.D., Yale Law School 1985; B.A., Indiana University
1981. I am grateful to D. Michael Risinger, Richard A. Leo, Meredith Ross, John
Pray, Byron Lichstein, and Frances Reynolds, as well as Ken Hammond and Dennis
Hanson, both of the Wisconsin Department of Justice Division of Law Enforcement
Services, Training & Standards Bureau, for their valuable feedback on drafts of this
Article.
**    Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin Law  School;
Director, Center for Problem-Oriented Policing; former police executive.  J.D.,
Harvard Law School 1987; B.A. University of Wisconsin-Madison 1980. I wish to
acknowledge the valuable insights offered by several veteran police investigators and
supervisors, including Deputy Chief Ron Glensor and Commander Steve Pitts, Reno
(Nev.) Police Department; Chief Dan Reynolds, Greer (S.C.) Police Department; Chief
Richard Thomas, Port Washington    (Wis.) Police Department; Chief R. Gil
Kerlikowske, Seattle Police Department; Ken Hammond, Wisconsin Department of
Justice Training & Standards Bureau; and Assistant United States Attorney Rita
Rumbelow, Western District of Wisconsin.
1.    Innocence Project, www.innocenceproject.org (last visited Feb. 22,
2006).
2.    Samuel R. Gross et al., Exonerations in the United States, 1989 Through
2003, 95 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 523, 523-24 (2005).
3.    Id. at 529.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most