About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

56 Washburn L.J. 123 (2017)
Standing on the Wrong Foot: The Seventh Circuit's Eccentric Attempt to Rescue Risk-Based Standing in Data Breach Litigation [Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Grp., 794 F.3d 688 (7th Cir. 2015)]

handle is hein.journals/wasbur56 and id is 129 raw text is: 







Standing on the Wrong Foot: The Seventh
Circuit's   Eccentric Attempt to Rescue Risk-Based
Standing in Data Breach Litigation [Remijas v.
Neiman Marcus Grp., 794 F.3d 688 (7th Cir. 2015)]


Jordan Z. Dillon*

                          I. INTRODUCTION
     Countless Americans  shop every day, using credit cards without a
thought  of the potential risk. Following  this customary  practice, a
customer  freely uses credit cards until he receives a letter from one of
his favorite stores. The store informs him its servers were hacked, and
an   unknown   third  party  likely accessed  its customers'   private
information.  The  man  is warned he might  experience charges on  his
credit card, and he should be on the lookout for unauthorized loans or
accounts opened  in his name.  Though  the store states the credit card
company   will likely reimburse the man  for such fraudulent action, it
offers no other support besides an apology. Frustrated and concerned,
the man  begins the lengthy process of acquiring new  credit cards and
incessantly  checking   his   credit  statements   for  the   smallest
inconsistencies.
     Thanks  to a string of data breaches across the country, this scenario
is familiar to millions of Americans and has left many victims disturbed
in its wake.1 Though the hackers are principally culpable for these acts,
the public's attention has begun shifting to the stores' negligent acts,
specifically their insufficiently-maintained security programs, resulting
in  a wave  of class actions.2  As  quickly as these suits developed,
however,  courts have  shut them  down   by stating the plaintiffs lack
standing to sue.3 The  courts argue that, because these plaintiffs have


    *  B.A. 2015, Truman State University; J.D. Candidate 2018, Washburn University School of
Law. I would like to thank my editors for their tireless efforts, my friends and family for their endless
encouragement, and my fiance Elizabeth for being the reason I do all of this.
    1. For up-to-date statistics on data breaches worldwide, see Breach Level Index, GEMALTO,
http://breachlevelindex.com/ [http://perma.cc/J5TZ-98NE].
    2. Monique C.M. Leahy, Litigation of Data Breach, 140 AM. JUR. TRIALs 327 § 8, Westlaw
 (database updated Dec. 2016).
    3. See, e.g., Reilly v. Ceridian Corp., 664 F.3d 38,42 (3d Cir. 2011).


123

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most