About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

85 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1315 (2007-2008)
Procedural Path Dependence: Discrimination and the Civil-Criminal Divide

handle is hein.journals/walq85 and id is 1321 raw text is: PROCEDURAL PATH DEPENDENCE: DISCRIMINATION AND THE CIVIL-CRIMINAL DIVIDE JULIE C. SUK* ABSTRACT Procedural path dependence occurs when the particular features of the procedural system that is charged with enforcing a given legal norm determine the substantive path of that norm. This Article shows how the limits of employment discrimination law in two different national contexts can be explained by procedural dynamics. In France, as in several European countries, employment discrimination law is enforced predominantly in criminal proceedings. French criminal procedure enables the discovery of information necessary to prove the facts of discrimination, whereas the limits of French civil procedure make it impossible for such information to be revealed. As a result, the substantive legal norm of nondiscrimination is being developed in French criminal law, in which the element of intent and the defendant's strong presumption of innocence are essential. In the United States, liberal civil procedure rules permit the broad discovery of information relevant to proving discrimination. At the same time, the civil litigation system has undermined the law's adaptability to the evolving social practices that threaten equal employment opportunity. The civil dimension of this procedural system, deeply rooted in the paradigm of the private damages action, tends to favor the employment discrimination claims that most closely resemble torts, thereby limiting the law's ability to address the complex causes of unequal employment opportunity. This, too, is an example of procedural path dependence. These examples reveal that discrimination is neither criminal nor civil in nature. To overcome its present limits, antidiscrimination law must transcend the substantive * © Julie C. Suk. Assistant Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University. Thanks to George Fletcher, Mitch Lasser, Youngjae Lee, Judith Resnik, Daniel Sabbagh, Joan Scott, Alex Stein, Stewart Sterk, and Jim Whitman for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article. The article also benefited from discussions by participants in the Comparative Law Colloquium at Columbia Law School, the Advanced Comparative Law Seminar at Yale Law School, the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, and faculty workshops at the Cardozo School of Law. I am grateful to Slim Ben Achour, Gwena~le Calves, Sophie Latraverse, and Samuel Thomas for their insights on the French context. All translations, unless otherwise noted, are my own. 1315

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most