About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

29 Wash. & Lee J. Civ. Rts. & Soc. Just. 55 (2022-2023)
Atkins v. Virginia at Twenty: Still Adaptive Deficits, Still in the Developmental Period

handle is hein.journals/walee29 and id is 56 raw text is: 








           Atkins v. Virginia at Twenty: Still
                  Adaptive Deficits, Still in the
                            Developmental Period


     Sheri Lynn Johnson, John H. Blume & Brendan  Van Winkle*


                           Abstract

    Twenty  years ago, in Atkins v. Virginia, the Supreme Court of
the United  States held that the Eighth Amendment   prohibited
states from executing persons with intellectual disability. While the
Court's decision is laudable and has  saved many  of the most
vulnerable persons  from  the executioner, its effect has been
undermined  by recalcitrant states attempting to exploit language in
the opinion permitting states to create procedures to implement the
(then) new categorical prohibition. In this article, we examine how
some  states have adopted procedures which  are fundamentally
inconsistent with the clinical consensus understanding  of the
disability and how one state, Georgia, has through the use of juries
and  a  crippling burden  of proof, rendered Atkins a  nullity.
Although  the Court  has intervened to prohibit some  of these
practices, it has not granted certiorari to consider others, including
Georgia's. And due to limits the Court has put on federal habeas
corpus relief, many persons who fall within the Court's categorical
bar prohibiting persons with  intellectual disability from being
sentenced to death or executed, have no effective state or federal
remedy.






   *   Sheri Lynn Johnson is the James and Mark Flanagan Professor of Law
and Co-director, Cornell Death Penalty Project, Cornell Law School. John H.
Blume is the Samuel F. Leibowitz Professor of Trial Techniques and Director,
Cornell Death Penalty Project, Cornell Law School. Brendan Van Winkle is the
Craig N. Yankwitt Capital Punishment Fellow, Justice 360.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most