About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

14 Va. J.L. & Tech. 1 (2009)

handle is hein.journals/vjolt14 and id is 1 raw text is: VIRGINIAJOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY SPRING 2009 UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA VOL. 14, No. 1 Of Process and Product: Kremen v. Cohen and the Consequences of Recognizing Property Rights in Domain Names NOAH M. SCHOTTENSTEINt ABSTRACT In Kremen v. Cohen the Ninth Circuit recognized a property right in domain names, defining property as any form of intangible benefit that is distinct and excludable. This reasoning is flawed for three reasons: (1) it is grounded in a faulty understanding of property law; (2) it is over-inclusive, capturing a variety of things and benefits that have been explicitly removed from the realm of property; (3) and it is under-inclusive, as it fails to consider a number of interests necessary for evaluating if something should be deemed property. This doctrine, broadly applied, would result in a massive expansion of legal interests classified as property. The Kremen court also failed to contemplate the collateral impact of such an expansive view of property. In addition to providing a remedy for interference with the right to exclude, property also functions as an interface between the owner and the society at large, assigning a number of responsibilities and burdens to the owner. For example, the location of property assists in determining important questions of jurisdiction, venue and choice of law, and classifying an intangible benefit as property means transforming it into a taxable asset. When recognizing domain names, or any other form of intangible resource, as property, one must carefully consider how the change in rights will affect dependent social and legal rules-something Kremen failed to do. For these reasons, Kremen is an inappropriate source of authority to rely upon when considering novel questions of intangible property rights. O 2006 Virginia Journal of Law & Technology Association, at http://www.vjolt.net. t J.D. Expected May 2009, University of Virginia School of Law; B.A. 2004, The Ohio State University. The author would like to thank his wife, Denise Schottenstein, and his daughter, Clara Schottenstein, for their loving support; Julia Mahoney, for taking the time and effort to serve as an advisor for this project; and James McDonald and Nicholas Degani, for their gracious assistance with editing.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most