About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

40 U. Kan. L. Rev. 219 (1991-1992)
Powers v. Ohio: Race-Based Peremptory Challenges

handle is hein.journals/ukalr40 and id is 1389 raw text is: 




Powers v. Ohio: Race-Based Peremptory
Challenges*


I. INTRODUCTION

  In 1986, the United States Supreme Court decreed in Batson v.
Kentucky' that the Equal Protection Clause forbids the prosecutor to
challenge potential jurors solely on account of their race or on the
assumption that black jurors as a group will be unable impartially to
consider the State's case against a black defendant. That decision
followed the principle enunciated in Strauder v. West Virginia.' The
Strauder Court ruled that a black defendant is denied equal protection
when he is put on trial before a jury whose composition is derived
from a jury venire that purposefully excluded members of his race.'
The Batson Court determined that a defendant first must show that
he is a member of a cognizable racial group, and that the prosecutor
has exercised peremptory challenges to remove from the venire members
of the defendant's race.4 That showing, when combined with other
factors, would evidence a violation of the defendant's equal protection
rights.5
  In 1991, the Supreme Court extended the Batson rule in Powers v.
Ohio.6 The Court held that a criminal defendant may object to race-
based ... peremptory challenges whether or not the defendant and
excluded juror share the same race.'7 The Powers Court ruled that the
equal protection rights of the excluded juror, not the defendant, were
violated by the strike.8
  This Note will argue that the Powers Court inappropriately extended
the Batson rule and will conclude that the Court should have limited
this rule to the logical boundary stressed in Batson: When the peremp-
torily challenged juror is the same race as the defendant.9 This limitation
recognizes that a defendant must suffer some real injury before pursuing
a constitutional claim, while also upholding the necessary and long-
standing American legal tradition of the use of peremptory challenges
to ensure an impartial jury in accordance with the Sixth Amendment.


   * Christopher T. Wilson
   1. 476 U.S. 79, 89 (1986).
   2. 100 U.S. 303 (1880).
   3. Batson, 476 U.S. at 85 (citing Strauder).
   4. Id. at 96 (citation omitted).
   5. Id.
   6. 111 S. Ct. 1364  (1991).
   7. Id. at 1366.
   8. Id. at 1372.
   9. See Batson, 476 U.S. at 94.


219

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most