About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

70 Fla. L. Rev. 225 (2018)
Should They Stay or Should They Go: Rethinking the Use of Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude in Immigration Law

handle is hein.journals/uflr70 and id is 233 raw text is: 



  SHOULD THEY STAY OR SHOULD THEY GO: RETHINKING
  THE   USE  OF CRIMES   INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE IN
                      IMMIGRATION LAW

                           Sara Salem*

                             Abstract
   Although absent from modem  English conversation, the words moral
turpitude continue to carry devastating consequences for undocumented
aliens living in the United States. Under federal immigration law, an alien
convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude may be deported or denied
entry into the United States. Perhaps most  significantly, nearly all
imiigration relief is conditioned on an alien having never been convicted
of a crime involving moral turpitude. So the question becomes, what is a
crime involving moral turpitude? There is currently no clear answer. No
one standard exists for determining whether a conviction qualifies as a
crime involving moral turpitude. Circuit courts are split, each applying
their own body of case law to determine issues of moral turpitude that
reach their dockets. This Note reviews the history and inconsistencies of
CIMT   jurisprudence, explains Attorney  General Mukasey's   failed
attempt to standardize the area, and finally recommends a  standard
approach to be applied by the BIA and circuit courts across the country.

INTRODUCTION                         ..............................................226

    I.   BACKGROUND                      .......................................230

    II.  PRE-SILVA-TREVINO IAPPROACH               ............ .........233
         A.  Step One: The Traditional Categorical Approach.........234
             1.  Least-Culpable-Conduct Test...................234
             2.  Common-Case   Approach   ...........   ........235
             3.  Realistic-Probability Test........     .........236
         B.  Step Two: The Modified Categorical Approach.............237

   III.  ATTORNEY  GENERAL  MUKASEY'S   FAILED ATTEMPT
         TO STANDARDIZE    .........................................238
         A.  Silva-Trevino 3-Step Approach ...........   ......239
         B.  Post-Silva-Trevino I Discord ............      ......241


     * J.D. Candidate 2018, University of Florida Levin College of Law. I would
foremost like to thank my dad, Mehrdad Salem, and David Barton for their enthusiastic
support and advice throughout the writing process. Additionally, I would like to thank
the student editors and staff of the Florida Law Review for their invaluable guidance.


225

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most