About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

90 U. Colo. L. Rev. 499 (2019)
Press Speakers and the First Amendment Rights of Listeners

handle is hein.journals/ucollr90 and id is 533 raw text is: 







      PRESS SPEAKERS AND THE FIRST
    AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF LISTENERS

                 RONNELL  ANDERSEN   JONES*

INTRODUCTION

    A  wave of scholarly and judicial attention to the rights of
listeners has moved   First Amendment   jurisprudence, in at
least some doctrinal subareas, to consider how the Constitution
might  value and protect audiences of speech and not just pro-
ducers of it. But this inquiry has largely focused on contexts
where  the rights of the speakers and listeners diverge. Less
discussed, but equally important,  are First Amendment   dy-
namics  in which speaker  and listener interests align, and in
which  the speaker needs additional protections to adequately
safeguard the fuller First Amendment  relationship. The most
notable of these dynamics is the constitutionally symbiotic re-
lationship between the institutional speakers of the press and
their public audiences.
    This Article explores American press freedom through the
lens of speaker-listener relationships. It argues that the unique
features  of this particular First Amendment partnership
should lead to greater appreciation of the press as a special in-
stitutional speaker and to greater protection for newsgathering
performed on behalf of listeners.
    Part I briefly describes the developing doctrine of listener
rights, exploring the protections courts and commentators have
argued are warranted for those who have interests in receiving
speech. It notes the ways in which the recent debates over the
doctrine have been motivated by instances where the interests
of listeners differ from those of the speaker and examines how
the doctrine must also apply in instances where speaker and


* Lee E. Teitelbaum Endowed Chair & Professor of Law, S.J. Quinney College of
Law, University of Utah and Affiliated Fellow, Yale Law School Information
Society Project. The author wishes to thank the participants of the 2018
Rothgerber Constitutional Law Conference at the University of Colorado Law
School for their valuable feedback on this Article and Rebekah Keller, Angie
Shewan, and Erin Reid for their research assistance.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most