About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

51 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (2003-2004)
Borderline Decisions: Hoffman Plastic Compounds, the New Bracero Program, and the Supreme Court's Role in Making Federal Labor Policy

handle is hein.journals/uclalr51 and id is 31 raw text is: BORDERLINE DECISIONS: HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS, THE NEW BRACERO PROGRAM, AND THE SUPREME COURT'S ROLE IN MAKING FEDERAL LABOR POLICY Christopher David Ruiz Cameron In Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an undocumented immigrant who has been fired in retaliation for exercising his right to engage in union organizing activity must nevertheless be denied the remedy of backpay. The majority reasoned that awarding backpay to vindicate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) would run afoul of conflicting provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act, which forbids the hiring of undocumented workers. Dean Cameron argues that Hoffman is the most recent manifestation of a decades-long process by which the Court has been elevated from an interpreter to a maker of federal labor policy. Since 1959, Congress has enacted practically no substantive reforms of the NLRA. But the Supreme Court has. Its vehicle of choice has been the borderline case, in which the majority erects a false conflict at the mar- gins separating the NLRA from some other federal law, then resolves the conflict by effectively abrogating the NLRA. In making federal labor policy, the Court's majority now favors four types of choices, none of which Congress would necessarily favor: judicial activism, isolationism from international labor law, protectionism of employers who violate the NLRA, and anarchism. In describing these choices, Dean Cameron pays special attention to judicial activism, which has effectively revived, and expanded, the old Bracero Program, a long- discredited series of laws and treaties under which the United States imported Mexican workers to work in the agricultural industry as indentured servants. IN TRO DU C TIO N ................................................................................................................. 2 I. THE FORMULA AS APPLIED: HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS ................................ 7 II. THE FORMULA AS DEVELOPED: BILDISCO, CONNELL, AND CARPENTERS (SAND DOOR) ........................................................................ 11 A . B ildisco ....................................................................................................... . . 11 * Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Law, Southwestern University School of Law, Los Angeles. A.B. 1980 University of California, Los Angeles; J.D. 1983 Harvard Law School. My thanks to Roberto Corrada, Kevin Johnson, Cynthia Nance, Michael Olivas, and Adrienne Wing for providing a forum in which to develop this Article at the AALS Annual Meeting in January 2003. Thanks also to Ruben Garcia, Julia Figueira-McDonough, Kevin Johnson, Gillian Lester, George Martinez, Isabel Medina, Lori Nessel, Jim Pope, Mary Romero, and Abel Valenzuela for their comments and suggestions. Research assistance was provided by Lauren Kovner (Class of 2003). Any mistakes in the final product are mine alone.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most