About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

27 Transnat'l L. & Contemp. Probs. 77 (2017-2018)
Contracting out of Non-Refoulement Protections

handle is hein.journals/tlcp27 and id is 87 raw text is: 






      Contracting Out of Non-Refoulement Protections

                        William Thomas Worster*
I.  IN TRODU CTION .......................................................................................... 77
II. NON-REFOULEMENT    OBLIGATION ................................................................. 77
III. A GREEING ON FACTS .................................................................................. 82
IV. AGREEING  ON JURISDICTION ..................................................................... 87
IV . N ORM ATIVE  CONFLICT  .................................................................................. 98
V . C ON CLU SION  ............................................................................................... 106
                             I.   INTRODUCTION
    Over the past few years, states have been entering into international
agreements that increasingly displace their non-refoulement obligations that
the Refugee Convention, Torture Convention, and human rights treaties
impose. Non-refoulement is a legal norm that prohibits countries from
expelling vulnerable people to states where they might face serious
mistreatment. This rule has been a cornerstone of the law on international
migration and forced movement for a considerable period; even being viewed
as a human right by some.1 However, recently states have begun entering
into  international agreements    and  treaties that overcome    the   non-
refoulement obligation through a number of arrangements. This Article looks
at three forms of contracting out of non-refoulement: agreements that
establish facts, agreements that establish jurisdiction, and agreements
creating competing norms.
    This Article documents an emerging trend and critiques that trend
legally. It does not seek to assess whether states have any mala fides in
adopting these agreements. In fact, good intentions motivated the adoption of
most of the agreements at issue: ensuring public security, prosecuting
international criminal law, and promptly returning of abducted children.
However, these agreements have had the effect of avoiding non-refoulement.
This Article draws attention to these effects, criticizes them, and emphasizes
that we should not lose sight of the need to protect vulnerable people from
expulsion.
                    II.   NON-REFOULEMENT OBLIGATION
    Multiple treaties impose an obligation not to expel a person to a situation

 Senior Lecturer, International Law, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, The
 Netherlands; Ph.D. candidate in Public International Law, University of Amsterdam, Faculty of
 Law, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; LL.M. (Adv.) in Public International Law, cum laude,
 Leiden University, Faculty of Law, Leiden, The Netherlands; J.D., Chicago-Kent College of Law,
 Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois; B.A., Modern European History, University of
 Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. This Article was initially presented at the 2016 American Society of
 International Law Research Forum in Seattle, Washington. The author thanks Leslie Johns and
 the other forum attendees for many helpful comments.
 1 See, e.g., U.N. High Comm'r Refugees, Sibylle Kapferer, The Interface Between Extradition and
 Asylum, U.N. Doc. PPLA/2003/05 (2003), http://www.refworld.org/docid/3fe846da4.html.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most