82 Tenn. L. Rev. 745 (2014-2015)
Denying the Dyad: How Criminalizing Pregnant Use Harms the Baby, Taxpayers and Vulnerable Women

handle is hein.journals/tenn82 and id is 761 raw text is: 




    DENYING THE DYAD: HOW CRIMINALIZING
    PREGNANT DRUG USE HARMS THE BABY,
      TAXPAYERS AND VULNERABLE WOMEN

               MELISSA BALLENGEE  ALEXANDER*

INTRODUCTION.................................           .......... 746
I.    BACKGROUND  AND HISTORY    ..................... .......751
     A.  Defining the Problem: Rising Drug Use and NAS ..........751
     B.  Intertwined Histories: Fetal Rights and Assault Liability . 755
II.   LAW EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZES PROSECUTING  PREGNANT DRUG
      USERS FOR ASSAULT     ............................. .....759
      A. Personhood, Abortion, and Criminal Liability for Assault
         Imposed On a Pregnant Woman at 'Any Stage of
         Gestation      .    ................................... 760
     B.  Ignoring the Primary Driver of Increasing NAS Births.....763
     C.  The Illusory Affirmative Defense Fails to Account for Lack
         of Available, Affordable, and Appropriate Treatment .... 766
         1. The Affirmative Defense Should Protect Women Who
            Seek Treatment, Not Only Those Able to Obtain It...... 766
         2. The Affirmative Defense Should Protect Women Who
            Seek Treatment, Even If They Enroll After Giving
            Birth     ............................ ........ 768
      D. An Underreported Amendment Creates Broad, Undefined
         Liability.....................           ............... 770
III.  CRIMINALIZING PREGNANT DRUG USE FAILS TO SERVE
      CRIMINAL LAW OBJECTIVES    ....................... .....773
      A. Restoration Fails: The Statute Is Not in the Baby's Best
         Interest   .......................... ............. 773
         1. An Incentive to Abort. .................. ......774
         2. A Dangerous Deterrent to Prenatal, Postpartum, and
            Newborn Care      ........................ ..... 777
         3. Because Demand  Exceeds Supply, No Net Treatment
            Benefit   .........................    ........ 778
         4. Undermines the Baby's Family...........       ......779
         5. Imposes Economic Hardship on the Baby..................781



       Associate Professor of Law, University of Wyoming College of Law; B.A.
Yale University; J.D., University of Virginia School of Law. With gratitude to
Professor Linda Fentiman for her thoughtful comments on my draft and special
thanks to Alex Wood Davenport, Craig Stewart, and Alexandra Birkner for
invaluable research assistance. Also, thanks to Belmont University College of Law
for a research grant.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?