About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

82 Temp. L. Rev. 1041 (2009-2010)
Sin Taxes: When the State Becomes the Sinner

handle is hein.journals/temple82 and id is 1049 raw text is: SIN TAXES: WHEN THE STATE BECOMES THE SINNER Andrew J Haile* To fill budget gaps, several state legislatures have proposed increasing existing taxes on tobacco and alcohol products. In addition, some states (as well as the federal government) are considering the enactment of new sin taxes, for example taxes on high-sugar drinks and internet pornography. This Article examines many of the traditional arguments for and against sin taxes. It then focuses on an argument that has previously received little attention-the conflict of interest created by a state's dependence on sin tax revenues. When states become dependent on sin tax revenues to fund essential government services, they develop an interest in maintaining sales of the sinful product. Consequently, the states' financial interest may conflict with the interest in protecting their citizens' health. The Article examines this conflict of interest in the context of the states' dependence on tobacco revenues. In particular, the Article explains how the $200 billion Master Settlement Agreement between the states and the major tobacco manufacturers aligns the states' and the tobacco companies' financial interests. The Article then considers two alternatives that may break, or at least mitigate, the alignment of interest between the states and the sellers of harmful, taxed products: earmarking and securitization. By earmarking or securitizing sin tax revenues, states decouple their financial interests from the interests of companies selling the sinful product. The Article concludes that unless states take action to address the conflict of interest that arises as a result of their dependence on sin tax revenues, the states themselves may become the sinners by sacrificing their citizens' health for much- needed revenue. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................1042 II. THE DEBATE OVER SIN TAXES ................................ ......1045 A. Common Arguments in Support ofSin Taxes ....................1045 1. Sin Taxes Raise Revenues ..................... .....1045 2. Sin Taxes Improve Health, Particularly Among the Most Vulnerable.....................................1046 3. Sin Taxes Fairly Allocate Negative Externalities ............1047 4. Sin Taxes Are More Politically Acceptable than Other Taxes........1048 B. Common Arguments Against Sin Taxes.............. .....................1049 * Assistant Professor, Elon University School of Law. The author thanks Catherine J. Wasson, Howard E. Katz, Eric M. Fink, Martha M. Peters, and Daniel Nash for their assistance in reviewing drafts of this Article. 1041

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most