About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

69 Syracuse L. Rev. 611 (2019)
Continuing Stigma: Why the FDA's Policy Deferring Men Who Have Sex with Men from Donating Blood Is Unconstitutional & a Poor Policy Choice

handle is hein.journals/syrlr69 and id is 627 raw text is: 






  CONTINUING STIGMA: WHY THE FDA'S POLICY
    DEFERRING MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN
 FROM DONATING BLOOD IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL
               & A  POOR   POLICY CHOICE

                       Michael Varriget

                           CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION                     ......................................... 612
I.   HISTORY           ........................................ 616
     A.  Testing and Research Have Changed Significantly Since
         the Original Ban Was Put into Place ......    .......616
     B.  LGBT  People Have Been Subject to Discrimination for
         Reasons Other Than Their Association with HIV/AIDS
         ...................................        .... 618
II.   HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY SHOULD  APPLY TO LAWS
      DISCRIMINATING ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION. 619
      A. Gender Discrimination Cases Provide Framework for
         Heightened Scrutiny             .................... 620
      B. Previous Cases Dealing with LGBT Discrimination Use
         More Exacting Scrutiny than Rational Basis .............622
III.  THE DEFERRAL VIOLATES THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE
      ................................           ........... 625
      A. Deferral Is Unnecessary Based Upon Other FDA
         Regulations and Current Scientific Knowledge .........626
      B. The Deferral Singularly Denies Blood Donation Benefits
         to Men Who Have Sex with Men        ................627
      C. Proponents of the Deferral Cannot Offer Reasoning
         Sufficient to Uphold It Under Heightened Scrutiny ... 628
IV.   THE DEFERRAL IS A POOR POLICY CHOICE      ............. 629
      A. Deferral Repeal Would Increase Blood Supply in the
          United States..   ............................... 629
      B.  U.S. Peer Countries Have Eliminated Their (or Never
         Had) Bans and Deferrals            ............ ......... 630
      C. A Risk-Based Assessment Would Make the Blood Supply
         Safer While Not Discriminating Against a Particular
         Group..       ..................................... 631

   f J.D. Candidate, Syracuse University College of Law, 2019; M.S. Forensic Science
Candidate, Syracuse University, 2019; B.S. Genetics & Legal Studies, University of Wiscon-
sin-Madison, 2016. I would like to thank Professor C. Cora True-Frost for her guidance during
the note writing process. I would also like to thank my partner, Andrew, and my family and
friends for their seemingly endless support.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most