About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

4 R.D. Linguistique 1 (2017-2020)
Enforcing Part VII of the Official Languages Act: The Structure of S. 41 as a Legal Norm

handle is hein.journals/rvdling4 and id is 9 raw text is: (2017-2020) 4 RDL 1 ENFORCING PART VII OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES ACT: THE STRUCTURE OF S. 41 AS A LEGAL NORM Erik Labelle Eastaugh* ABSTRACT Section 41 of the Official Languages Act is a critical component of Canada's language rights architecture but remains poorly understood from a legal perspective. This article explores in detail the nature and structure of s. 41 as a legal norm. The discussion is divided into three parts. Part I conducts a conceptual analysis based solely on the text of s. 41, in order to canvass more systematically than has been done to date the range of interpretive possibilities offered by that provision. To that end, I first consider whether s. 41(2) should be viewed as creating a right, properly speaking, or rather some other form of duty, and what consequences this might have for its substantive content. Next, I explore in some detail the structure of that duty-or rather, the competing theories as to how that structure should be defined, which I label the Holistic Thesis and the Casuistic Thesis. Part II then sets out to resolve this fundamental ambiguity, and argues that the Casuistic Thesis ought to be preferred. I begin with a detailed analysis of the legislative history of the 2005 amendments to s. 41, which demonstrates that the Casuistic Thesis offers by far the best account of Parliament's intent in adopting those changes. I then briefly consider the specialized interpretive principles applicable to language rights measures, which also support this conclusion. Finally, in Part III, I offer a case study of the Casuistic Thesis in practice by analysing a relatively recent Federal Court decision involving Statistics Canada, which I argue was wrongly decided. * Erik Labelle Eastaugh est avocat chez CazaSaikaley srl. Il ddtient un doctorat en droit constitutionnel de l'Universite d'Oxford. Le present texte est tire de la these doctorale de 1'auteur, qui tient A remercier le Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada pour son appui financier a ce chapitre. L'auteur tient 4galement A remercier Denise Reaume, Frangois Larocque, Nazila Ghanea-Hercock et Alyssa Tomkins pour leurs commentaires qui ont sensiblement enrichi les versions anterieures de ce texte. Evidemment, 1'auteur demeure sel responsable de toute erreur on omission.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most