About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

70 Rutgers U.L. Rev. 1093 (2017-2018)
How Criminal Law Dictates Rules of Criminal Procedure

handle is hein.journals/rutlr70 and id is 1155 raw text is: 







    How   CRIMINAL LAw DICTATES RULES OF CRIMINAL
                          PROCEDURE

                        Darryl  K. Brown*

                             ABSTRACT

      Choices  about   criminal   law  and   punishment have
    implications for procedural rules. Some  criminal procedure
    rules are recognized as fundamental to the rule of law, individual
    rights, or fair administration of criminal justice. They are
    constitutive of criminal justice and should hold regardless of
    changes  in substantive  criminal  law. Others  are  merely
    instrumental; other procedures could accomplish the same thing
    just as well. But a third type of procedural rule is required or
    highly favored by a jurisdiction's choices about how to define its
    criminal law and  its punishment policies. These rules can be
    critical to legitimacy because choices about crime definitions and
    punishment  policies have made them  necessary for legitimate
    implementation of criminal law. In this way, substantive law
    and  procedure are  interdependent: a particular account  of
    criminal law requires corresponding procedural features and is
    incompatible with others. Likewise, some procedural institutions
    reflect a specific theory of criminal law or punishment.

      This paper explores this substance-procedure interdependence
    by focusing on  rules of charging and  sentencing authority.
    Charging-authority  rules  either  grant  prosecutors  wide
    discretion in deciding whether to charge actors whose guilt they
    can prove, or prohibit such discretion by imposing a mandatory
    prosecution duty. Sentencing-authority rules either give judges
    discretion to fix a sentence within an authorized range or bar
    such  discretion  by  mandating   specific punishments   for
    particular offenses. When legislatures fail to define criminal
    liability criteria precisely enough to match individual moral
    culpability--as they sometimes deliberately do, and as many
    think is sometimes   inevitable-procedural discretion is the

*O.M. Vicars Professor of Law, University of Virginia School of Law; brownd@virginia.edu.


1093

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most