4 Potchefstroom Elec. L.J. 1 (2001)

handle is hein.journals/per2001 and id is 1 raw text is: UTILIZING CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES IN CONSTITUTIONAL
COMPARISON
Francois Venter
1. Constitutional comparison
We are living in an era in which constitutional law has become a comparative science.
This is not true only for developing constitutional states, but for the constitutional law
of all constitutional states.  The reason for this is that the history of modem
constitutionalism has reached a global fullness of development, from which emanates
a distinct set of commonalities, principles, standards and values that have gained
currency in constitutional dialogue all over the world. Perhaps the best proof of this
ripeness of constitutionalism is to be found in the signs that new, postmodem thinking
about the state, the law and the sustainability of the established tenets of
constitutionalism is pushing at the gates of globally received constitutional doctrine.1
Despite this push for a postmodem replacement of modernist constitutional thinking,
which is essentially the product of Euro-American thinking over many centuries, the
contemporary constitutionalist inevitably continues to operate with this product. It
entails constitutionally enshrined values, entrenched fundamental rights, judicial
review, the separation of powers, democratic processes, etc. Exactly because these
and similar constitutional notions share a multi-national history and universal
acceptance as standards for sound constitutional structuring, the constitutional lawyer
cannot but be a comparatist. The practice of constitutional comparison has become
the norm in some, especially European, jurisdictions. There are however many
jurisdictions where this is not the case and where the basic principles of the
comparative practice are not well known. It is therefore worth the exercise to briefly
2
introduce some of these principles before proceeding.
1  Cf Venter 257-262
2  The approach to constitutional comparison followed here, is more extensively dealt with in
Venter F Constitutional Comparison (Juta and Kluwer Cape Town, Cambridge (MA) and
Dordrecht 2000) Chapter 1.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?