About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

28 Pace L. Rev. 683 (2007-2008)
Consent to Harm

handle is hein.journals/pace28 and id is 691 raw text is: Consent To Harm

Vera Bergelson*
The case of People v. Jovanovic, dubbed by tabloids the
cybersex torture case,1 began in November 1996, when Jamie
Ruzcek, a twenty-year-old Barnard student, reported to the po-
lice that she had been sexually assaulted by Oliver Jovanovic, a
thirty-year-old doctoral candidate at Columbia University.2
The alleged assault happened during the first live date be-
tween Jovanovic and Ruzcek, which took place after weeks of
their on-line conversations and e-mail correspondence.3 Accord-
ing to Ruzcek, Jovanovic had hogtied her for nearly twenty
hours, violently raped and sodomized her, struck her repeatedly
with a club, severely burned her with candle wax, and repeat-
edly gagged her with a variety of materials.4
Jovanovoic was prosecuted, convicted of kidnapping, sexual
abuse, and assault, and sentenced to a term of 15 years to life.5
He was released after twenty months in prison when the appel-
late court ruled that the trial judge improperly denied admis-
sion of portions of Ruzcek's e-mails to Jovanovic, in which she
discussed her sadomasochistic interests and experience.6 The
* Professor of Law, Robert E. Knowlton Scholar, Rutgers School of Law-New-
ark; J.D., University of Pennsylvania; Ph.D., Institute of Slavic and Balkan Stud-
ies at the Academy of Sciences of the Soviet Union. This article will be published
in substantially the same form as a chapter in a multi-authored book, THE ETHICS
OF CONSENT: THEORY AND PRACTICE (Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer eds.,
2009). This article is based, in part, and continues the discussion of problems re-
lated to consent to harm started in Vera Bergelson, The Right to Be Hurt: Testing
the Boundaries of Consent, 75 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 165 (2007). I am grateful to the
participants of the Victims and Criminal Justice System symposium at Pace Law
School for their thoughtful comments and to the deputy director of Rutgers Law
Library, Paul Axel-Lute, and my research assistant, Linda Posluszny, for their
massive help in researching this project.
1. Jovanovic v. City of New York, No. 04-8437, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59165,
at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2006).
2. Id. at *4.
3. People v. Jovanovic, 700 N.Y.S.2d 156, 159 (App. Div. 1999).
4. Jovanovic, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59165, at *4.
5. Id. at *9.
6. Jovanovic, 700 N.Y.S.2d at 159.

683

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most