72 Or. L. Rev. 753 (1993)
Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of Bronson: The Oregon Supreme Court Recognizes the Negligent Misrepresentation Tort

handle is hein.journals/orglr72 and id is 767 raw text is: Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of

Bronson: The Oregon Supreme
Court Recognizes the Negligent
Misrepresentation Tort
Since the late nineteenth century, state courts have held informa-
tion providers liable in tort for misstatements which cause parties
who rely on the information to suffer pecuniary loss. ' Such liability
is well established in cases where the loss accompanies physical
damage to the property2 or person3 of the plaintiff or where the
information provider acts with intent to deceive the plaintiff.4
However, where there is not accompanying physical damage and
where the information provider's culpability is mere negligence,
courts have been more reluctant to allow recovery. Only within the
last sixty years has American tort law begun to recognize such
negligent misrepresentations.' To date, the tort is recognized in
at least thirty jurisdictions.6
In December 1992 the Oregon Supreme Court, in Onita Pacific
Corp. v. Trustees of Bronson,' recognized the negligent misrepresen-
tation tort.8 Unfortunately, in so doing, the court adopted a scope
I See William L. Prosser, Misrepresentation and Third Persons, 19 VAND. L. REV.
231, 233 (1966).
21d. at 232; see, e.g., Banker's Trust Co. v. Steenburn, 409 N.Y.S.2d 51 (Sup. Ct.
1978), aff'd, 418 N.Y.S.2d 723 (App. Div. 1979).
3 See, e.g., RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS  311 (1965); Seagraves v. ABCO
Mfg. Co., 164 S.E.2d 242 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968); Ligon Specialized Hauler, Inc. v. Inland
Container Corp., 581 S.W.2d 906 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979).
4 Prosser, supra note 1, at 233-34; see, e.g., RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS
 525 (1977); Candelora v. Clouser, 621 F. Supp. 335 (D. Del. 1985), aff'd sub nom.
Candelora v. Ryan, 802 F.2d 446 (3d Cir. 1986); Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., 288
N.W.2d 95 (Wis. 1980).
5 See Michael D. Lieder, Constructing a New Action for Negligent Infliction of Eco-
nomic Loss: Building on Cardozo and Coase, 66 WASH. L. REV. 937, 948 (1991).
6See infra notes 37, 39, 41.
7 315 Or. 149, 843 P.2d 890 (1992).
8 Id. at 152, 843 P.2d at 892. In 1987, the Oregon Supreme Court considered recog-
nizing the tort of negligent misrepresentation. Duyck v. Tualatin Valley Irrigation
Dist., 304 Or. 151, 742 P.2d 1176 (1987). However, the court was spared the necessity
because a statute of limitations defense rendered the negligent misrepresentation issue
moot. Id. at 156, 742 P.2d at 1178. Justice Peterson, writing for the majority, indicated

[753]

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?