About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

95 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 498 (2020)
Should Law Subsidize Driving?

handle is hein.journals/nylr95 and id is 498 raw text is: 













      SHOULD LAW SUBSIDIZE DRIVING?



                             GREGORY H. SHILL*


    A century ago, captains of industry and their allies in government launched a social
    experiment in urban America: the abandonment of mass transit in favor of a new
    personal technology, the private automobile. Decades of investment in this shift
    have created a car-centric landscape with Dickensian consequences. In the United
    States, motor vehicles are now the leading killer of children and the top producer of
    greenhouse gases. Each year, they rack up trillions of dollars in direct and indirect
    costs and claim nearly 100,000 American lives via crashes and pollution, with the
    most vulnerable paying a disproportionate price. The appeal of the car's conve-
    nience and the failure to effectively manage it has created a public health catas-
    trophe. Many of the automobile's social costs originate in individual preferences,
    but an  overlooked amount  is encouraged  indeed enforced  by law. Yes, the
    United States is car-dependent by choice. But it is also car-dependent by law. This
    Article conceptualizes this problem and offers a way out. It begins by identifying a
    submerged, disconnected system of rules that furnish indirect yet extravagant subsi-
    dies to driving. These subsidies lower the price of driving by comprehensively reas-
    signing its costs to non-drivers and society at large. They are found in every field of
    law, from traffic law to land use regulation to tax, tort, and environmental law.
    Law's  role is not primary, and at times it is even constructive. But where it is
    destructive, it is uniquely so: Law not only inflames a public health crisis but legiti-
    mizes  it, ensuring the continuing dominance of the car. The Article urges a
    reorientation of law away from this system of automobile supremacy in favor of
    consensus social priorities, such as health, prosperity, and equity.





    * Copyright © 2020 by Gregory  H. Shill, Associate Professor of Law, University of
Iowa  College of Law; Visiting Scholar, American Bar  Foundation; Program  Affiliate
Scholar, N.Y.U. School of Law. B.A., Columbia University; J.D., Harvard Law School. For
their very helpful feedback, I thank Patrick Barry, Lisa Bernstein, Chris Bradley, Sara
Bronin, Nestor Davidson, Chris Drahozal, Robin Effron, Sheila Foster, Peter Furth, Clay
Gillette, Jack Goldsmith, Jesse Halfon, Cara Hamann, Rick Hills, John Infranca, Randall
Johnson, David  Kagan, Leandra  Lederman, Michael  Lewyn, Albert Lin, Marc  Linder,
James  Lindgren, Irina Manta, Roger Noll, Peter Norton, Mark Osiel, Michael Pollack,
Anya  Prince, Jason Rantanen, Erin Ryan, David Schleicher, Angie Schmitt, Kenn Sebesta,
Sarah Seo, Steve Shavell, Donald Shoup, Jacob Simmering, Holger  Spamann,  Kenneth
Stahl, Ari Stern, Sean Sullivan, Cass Sunstein, Calvin Thigpen, Cristina Tilley, Ryan
Westrom,  and participants at the State & Local Government WIP at Fordham Law School,
Celebrating Commons  Scholarship at Georgetown University Law Center, Northwestern-
Penn-Stanford Junior Faculty Forum  for Law  and STEM,   Road  Safety & Simulation,
SEALS,  and  workshops at the law schools of the University of Chicago, Hofstra, Iowa,
Northwestern, and Wayne   State, and the urban planning schools of the University of
Illinois at Chicago and the University of Pennsylvania. I am also grateful to Eremipagamo
Amabebe   and fellow editors of the New York University Law Review  as well as Amy
Koopmann   and colleagues in the Iowa Law library, and to Allen Paxton, Melissa Sharp,
and Matthew  Strand for invaluable research assistance. Any errors are mine alone.

                                        498


Imaged   with Permission   of N.Y.U. Law   Review

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most