About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

116 Nw. U. L. Rev. Online 148 (2021-2022)
Zones of Discretion at Common Law

handle is hein.journals/nulro116 and id is 148 raw text is: NORTHWE STERNUNIVERSITYLAWREVIEWONLINE
ZONES OF DISCRETION AT COMMON LAW
James E. Pfander
ABSTRACT-Long controversial, the doctrine of qualified immunity
provides a civil liability shield for police officers and other executive branch
officials. Scholars have questioned the doctrine, in part on the basis that it
lacks support in the common law rules of official liability that were in place
in the nineteenth century when Section 1983 became law. In a recently
published article, Scott Keller defends the doctrine's legality by arguing that
the common law did indeed recognize forms of qualified immunity.
This Essay suggests that the authorities on which Keller relies comprise
a body of administrative law, defining zones of official discretion, rather than
a body of qualified immunity law. Many of the doctrines Keller identifies
operate much the way Chief Justice Marshall's account of judicial review
operated in Marbury v. Madison. Chief Justice Marshall acknowledged that
matters lawfully assigned to the discretion of the executive branch were
beyond the scope of judicial review. But where an official's lawful discretion
ended and legal boundaries were transgressed, the common law was
available (indeed obliged, according to Chief Justice Marshall) to supply a
remedy. In much of what Keller points to, common law courts were deferring
to executive action taken within the zones of their lawful discretion. But the
common law did not confer a qualified immunity when executive officials
transgressed those boundaries and violated protected rights.
AUTHOR-Owen L. Coon Professor of Law, Northwestern University
Pritzker School of Law. Thanks to Will Baude, Henry Monaghan, Jide
Nzelibe, Alex Reinert, and Joanna Schwartz for thoughtful and
comprehensive comments, suggestions, and spreadsheets. Thanks to
HanByul Chang and the editors of Northwestern Law Review Online for
close reads and excellent editorial suggestions.

148

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most