7 NUJS L. Rev. [i] (2014)

handle is hein.journals/nujslr7 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                      I. INTRODUCTION

            In the plethora of legal writing available, judgments rendered
by courts as well as articles written by law professors and students occupy a
crucial position. However, the writing in both these branches of legal scholar-
ship is riddled with certain flaws which have the deleterious effect of lowering
the overall quality of legal scholarship. We intend to shed light on these sys-
temic defects. Addressing the defects would be beneficial for litigants, lawyers,
judges, law students, law professors, organizations and the general public. In
Part II, we discuss legal judgment writing by judges as a subset of legal scholar-
ship, and underline the importance of making judgments precise, reasoned and
comprehensive. In Part III we scrutinise legal pedagogy in law schools, and the
reasons behind the lack of meaningful engagement with empirical exploration
in the works of law professors and students in the course of their research. In
Part IV we draw some conclusions.


            A large, but under-recognized, part of legal writing is not only
found in treatises and articles but also in judgments. As is well known, judg-
ments are one of the primary 'sources' of law. The Code of Civil Procedure,
1908 ('CPC') refers to the term 'decree' and defines it as a formal expression
of an adjudication which conclusively determines the rights of the parties.'
The word 'judgment' is also specifically defined under the CPC to mean the
statement given by the judge on the grounds of a decree or order. Order XX
Rule 4(2) of the CPC goes on to prescribe what a judgment should contain - a
concise statement of the case, the points for determination, the decision thereon,
and the reasons for such decision. Though these terms are defined specifically,
through this note reference to a 'judgment' will encompass a broader reference
to formal orders given by judges who preside over Courts as well as officers
who preside over Tribunals and other quasi-judicial bodies.

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,  2(2).
2 The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,  2(9).

January -March, 2014

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.

Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?