About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

4 Nat'l L.U. Delhi Stud. L.J. 53 (2017)
Sovereignty, Development and International Economic Law: Some Insights from WTO Dispute Settlement

handle is hein.journals/nludslj4 and id is 59 raw text is: SOVEREIGNTY, DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW: SOME INSIGHTS FROM WTO DISPUTE SETTLEMENT Sannoy Das* In this paper the author examines the relationship between developing nations and the WTO dispute settlement framework, focusing on the interpretative methods of and epistemic protocols employed by WTO adjudicatory bodies. The imperialist history of international law in general, and of international economic law in particular has meant that the sovereignty of developing nations has always been a negotiable commodity, subject to the interests of western capital. The author argues that this imperialist strain has cast its long shadow on the prevailing interpretative methods of the WTO dispute settlement bodies. By leaning in favour of a strict textualist approach, while failing to factor 'development'as a teleological aim of the international trade order, the WTO mechanism has prioritised vague notions of certainty over substantive justice in international trade. Aside from the inherent suitability of such a textualist approach to the furtherance of entrenched neo-liberal ideals, the adoption of formalistic reasoning by WTO dispute settlement bodies narrows the ability of States to claim broad regulatory justifications for their policy choices based on their development interests. Thus, despite the rhetoric of 'development'being at the forefront of the political discourse of international trade in the 21st century, 'development'as such is excluded from the process of WTO dispute settlement. In this way, it is argued that the international trade order retains, as any imperialist system ofa governance, a sense of liberal politics while acting through deeply conservative law. * Assistant Professor, Jindal Global Law School; sdasgjgu.edu.in. I am grateful for the research assistance that Ms. Vinitika Vij has rendered. I am indebted to the participants at the academic sym- posium during the WTO@20 Conference hosted by the Harvard Law School (27-29 April 2016) for their comments; to Prof. Mark Wu; to Dr. Rakesh Ankit for having read and commented on this draft, particularly on the historical claims; and, to Prof. Krithika Ashok for having offered detailed comments on several rounds of drafts.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most