About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

95 N.C. L. Rev. 133 (2016-2017)
Drone Zoning

handle is hein.journals/nclr95 and id is 141 raw text is: DRONE ZONING* TROY A. RULE* The growing popularity of small civilian drones has generated a wide array of complex and unprecedented regulatory challenges. Many of these challenges, such as keeping drones away from manned aircraft, are matters that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is clearly authorized and well equipped to address. However, several other drone policy challenges relate solely to drones' potential to disrupt landowners' privacy and to otherwise interfere with activities on the ground. The nature and severity of these conflicts often varies greatly depending on a drone's specific location; drone uses that are welcomed in some city neighborhoods may be prohibitively disruptive in others. The FAA, a centralized federal agency, lacks the information and resources necessary to effectively regulate these inherently local drone use issues. Recognizing this fact, cities and states are increasingly crafting their own drone laws., Soon, some municipalities might even find it beneficial to adopt drone zoning ordinances that specifically restrict where, when, and under what conditions civilian drones may fly within their jurisdictions. Unfortunately, the FAA has taken the position that it holds extremely broad regulatory authority over nearly every aspect of civilian drone activity-a position that threatens to preclude the development of valuable state and local drone policies. What aspects of drone activity could be better regulated at the state or local level than at the federal level? And what principles should guide municipal governments as they craft drone policies for their own communities? This Article tackles these questions, highlighting the potential merits of greater state and local involvement in drone law and identifying foundational principles * @ 2016 Troy A. Rule. ** Professor of Law, Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law. J.D. 2005 University of Chicago Law School; B.S. 2001, Brigham Young University. The author wishes to thank Karen Bradshaw Schulz, Laura Napoli Coordes, Zachary J. Gubler, Rhett B. Larson, Kaipo Matsumura, Erin Adele Scharff; attendees of New America July 2015 Drones and Aerial Observation Conference; and participants in the Ohio State Business Law Journal October 2015 Drones as Disruption Symposium for their valuable insights on the issues covered in this Article. Thanks also to John Keiter for his excellent research assistance.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most