About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

21 N.C. J.L. & Tech. 1 (2019-2020)
Facebook's Oversight Board: Move Fast with Stable Infrastructure and Humility

handle is hein.journals/ncjl21 and id is 9 raw text is: NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY VOLUME 21, ISSUE 1: OCTOBER 2019 FACEBOOK'S OVERSIGHT BOARD: MOVE FAST WITH STABLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND HUMILITY Evelyn Douek* Facebook's proposed Oversight Board is one of the most ambitious constitution-making projects of the modern era. With pre- existing governance of tech platforms delegitimized in the ongoing techlash, this represents a pivotal moment when new constitutional forms can emerge that will shape the future of online discourse. For all the potential of the Facebook Oversight Board (FOB), there are many things it cannot be. It will not hear a sufficient proportion of Facebook's content moderation cases to be a meaningful response to calls for greater due process in individual decisions. Nor will it be able to become a font of globally accepted speech norms for the worldwide platform. The true value that the Board can bring to Facebook's content moderation ecosystem lies between these two extremes of individual error correction and the settlement of globally applicable speech rules. The institutional offering of the Board shouldfocus on two primary, but more modest, functions. First, it can help highlight weaknesses in the policy formation process at Facebook, removing blockages (such as blind spots and inertia) in the legislative process leading to the formulation of its Community Standards. Second, by providing an independent forum for the discussion of disputed content moderation decisions, the Board can be an important forum for the public reasoning necessary for persons in a pluralistic community to come to accept the rules that govern them, even if they disagree with the substance of those rules. Understanding the institutional role of the Board in these terms provides useful insights into the institutional design that will best help it achieve these goals. * Doctoral candidate, Harvard Law School. B. Com./LL.B. UJNSW (Hons. I). Thanks are owed to Martha Minow, Jack Goldsmith, Cass Sunstein, Noah Feldman, Thomas Kadri, Elettra Bietti, Rafe Andrews and the editors of N.C. JOLT. I can't fob my errors off onto anyone else though; they remain my own.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most