About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

82 Mo. L. Rev. 843 (2017)
Immunity from Wrongful Death Liability: How Mickels Fails to Compensate

handle is hein.journals/molr82 and id is 865 raw text is: NOTE Immunity from Wrongful Death Liability: How Mickels Fails to Compensate Mickels v. Danrad, 486 S.W.3d 327 (Mo. 2016) (en banc) Kevin Buchanan* I. INTRODUCTION Wrongful death statutes originated out of a need to compensate the family of a decedent whose life was wrongfully taken.' Closely related to wrongful death statutes are survivorship statutes, which allow for the transmission of tort claims after the death of one or more of the parties.2 These statutes help address the once common maxim that it's cheaper to kill a man than to maim him.3 Today, all fifty states have both wrongful death and survivorship statutes.4 In Mickels v. Danrad, the Supreme Court of Missouri declined to allow wrongful death claims where a defendant's negligence accelerates the death of a terminally ill decedent.5 However, the court determined that a decedent's family may have a survivorship claim for personal injuries not resulting in death.6 In doing so, the court perpetuated a trend that fails to accomplish the intended goal of wrongful death statutes: to compensate a decedent's family.7 Part II of this Note looks at the facts and holding of Mickels. Part In examines the wrongful death and survivorship claims as well as the past prec- edent of such claims in the context of medical malpractice and improper diag- noses. Part IV then introduces the wrongful death and survivorship issues pre- sented in Mickels. Finally, Part V distinguishes Mickels from precedent and argues in favor of the dissent. * B.A., New York University, 2015; J.D. Candidate, University of Missouri School of Law, 2018; Note and Comment Editor, Missouri Law Review, 2017-2018. I would like to extend a special thank you to Professor Philip G. Peters and the entire Missouri Law Review staff for their support and guidance in writing this Note. 1. Wex S. Malone, The Genesis of Wrongful Death, 17 STAN. L. REv. 1043, 1044 (1965). 2. Id. 3. W. PAGE KEETON ET AL., PROSSER AND KEETON ON THE LAW OF TORTS § 127 (5th ed. 1984). 4. Jonathan James, Comment, Denial of Recovery to Nonresident Beneficiaries Under Washington's Wrongful Death and Survival Statutes: Is It Really Cheaper to Kill a Man Than to Maim Him, 29 SEATTLE U. L. REv. 663, 666 (2006). 5. Mickels v. Danrad, 486 S.W.3d 327, 331 (Mo. 2016) (en banc). 6. Id. 7. Id. at 332 (Teitelman, J., dissenting).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most