About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

13 Manchester J. Int'l Econ. L. 357 (2016)
The Many Identities of the European Union: Exploring the Rival Trade and Investment Ambitions of Organization and Members

handle is hein.journals/mjiel13 and id is 380 raw text is: 






Manchester Journal of International Economic Law
Volume 13, Issue 3: 357-387, 2016




  The Many Identities of the European Union: Exploring the Rival Trade
           and Investment Ambitions of Organization and Members

                           Bernhard Maier and Anna Pitaraki*


ABSTRACT: From the European Commission's view, an 'ever closer Union' in EU trade and
investment policy would be desirable. The disarray, division and confrontation between the EU as
represented by the European Commission and its Member States in the trade and investment realms
highlights the tension of international organizations law  that between the organization on the one
and its Member States on the other hand. Brexit could be seen as an extreme example of this tension;
as do the protracted and lengthy negotiations for the comprehensive free trade and investment
agreement with Canada which has entered into force provisionally. The EU Commission 's
interventions in relation to the intra-EU BITframework are another noteworthy illustration of this
tension. This article will analyse a number of initiatives of the European Commission in light of
Member State policy and comment upon some of the legal issues faced by States, public entities and
private actors in the current landscape.





                                    1. INTRODUCTION

                      It is one of the brilliant curiosities of the EU that we can all project our own
                      professional identities onto it. Many constitutional lawyers are wont to see
                      the EU as a sort of constitution beyond the nation-state; for private lawyers,
                      it has above all to do with the free movement of goods, services, capital and
                      workers, and competition law, and is thus predominantly a form of
                      organizing a market across frontiers. For the international lawyer, it is an
                      international organization: it may be an organization sui generis, as is often
                      argued, but an organization still it is.
                                                                    - Professor Jan Klabbers1

At the time of the writing of this article, EU trade policy has received a profound shock. The
outcome of the UK European Union membership referendum has called into question some of
the most important parameters both in the internal and external EU trade and investment context,
including questions of sovereignty, competence and institutional design.2 The controversy



* Bernhard Maier, DLA Piper, email: bmjmaier@ gmail.com; Dr. Anna Pitaraki, European University Institute, email:
anna.pitaraki@ eui.eu.
1 Jan Klabbers, An Introduction to International Organizations (3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2015), at 15,
n. 58.
2 See, generally, European Parliament Directorate General for External Policies, Responsibility in Investor State
Arbitration in the EU, December 2012, at 9, available at: www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/join/2012/45712

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most