About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

59 Loy. L. Rev. 947 (2013)
Reconsidering Recusals: The Need for Requirements for When Not to Recuse

handle is hein.journals/loyolr59 and id is 989 raw text is: RECONSIDERING RECUSALS: THE NEED FOR REQUIREMENTS FOR WHEN NOT TO RECUSE Mason E. Lowe* ABSTRACT In the American judiciary system, it is imperative that judges act free of bias. Although this seems to be an easy-enough-to- understand theory, its practical application is not always so simple. As a result, there have been wide-ranging, unpredictable, and sometimes undesirable results. Others have noted the need for clearer recusal rules and guidelines. There have been various suggestions for how to improve or reform recusal rules, all of which note that there is a lack of standardized and predictable rules for when judges are required to recuse themselves. These previous suggestions have correctly identified the root of the problem and provided practical solutions to the problem of judges improperly refusing to recuse themselves, but they have also ignored a significant problem with the current landscape of recusal law: an equal need of standardized guidance for when not to recuse, an area not adequately considered to this point. This is not just a hypothetical problem. As the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit's en banc decision in Comer v. Murphy Oil shows, a judge's decision to recuse can be just as detrimental, if not more so, than a judge's decision not to recuse. This Article first briefly outlines the historical background of and purpose behind recusals. It then discusses the odd-but certainly potentially repeatable-procedural path of Murphy Oil, which ultimately led to the dismissal of an appellant's victory as if no appeal had ever taken place, explaining why this decision was * William & Mary Law School Full-time Faculty. Throughout the various stages of this Article, I have benefited greatly from the extraordinary advice and comments of Professors Meredith Aden and Christopher Lund. Thank you also to Ben Abel and Christopher Meredith for their outstanding research assistance. Any and all mistakes are entirely mine. 947

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most