About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

39 Law & Pol'y 412 (2017)
The Morality of Divestment

handle is hein.journals/lawpol39 and id is 412 raw text is: 









                      The Morality of Divestment


                                     JEREMY MOSS


   Divestment from companies that produce or heavily utilize fossil fuels has become one of the
   biggest issues in the contemporary moral debate surrounding climate change. Universities and
   other institutions are being asked to divest themselves of their fossilfuel-related investments. In
   this article I argue that, while the case for divestment is morally strong, not all of the arguments
   used to support divestment are equally strong. Moreover, which of these arguments is employed
   matters a great deal for the strength of the conclusions regarding divestment. There are two
   major groups of arguments: what I call positive arguments for divestment, which stem from the
   claim that divestment is a response to general duties to take action to prevent dangerous climate
   change, and what I call negative arguments, which stem from a duty not to cause harm. In this
   article I will briefly characterize what divestment means and to whom it applies. I will then look
   at negative and positive duty accounts of the duty to divest before looking at the standard
   objections to both. Objections have tended to cohere around the claims that divesting is
   inconsistent, useless and/or harmful, or should be abandoned for better options to avoid
   dangerous climate change.



                 I. INTRODUCTION:   DIVESTMENT AND CLIMATE JUSTICE

Divestment  from  companies  that produce  or heavily utilize fossil fuels has become one of
the biggest issues in the contemporary  moral  debate  surrounding  climate change.  Pres-
sured by  student and  civil society-based movements,  universities and other institutions
are being asked to divest themselves of fossil fuel-related investments. To date, there have
been some  very major  institutions and funds that have begun  to divest, the most notable
being Norway's   Government   Pension Fund.  Yet, predominantly  it is nonstate actors who
are providing the impetus  for divestment, with many  universities and civil society groups
embracing  it.
  There  are many   arguments  for why  institutions ought to divest. Some  argue that we
ought  to divest for economic  reasons, given that fossil fuel assets are likely to be worth
much   less in the future. Others argue that investing in fossil fuel companies  is simply
inconsistent with the values of some institutions such as universities. This is especially so
where  a university invests in a company  that deliberately denies or supports  deniers of
many   of the claims of the very climate scientists who work at that university (Frumhoff,
Heede,  and Oreskes  2015).


This article benefitted from the comments received following presentations at the University of Tasmania and
the Society of Applied Philosophy Conference in Belfast. I would like to thank Neil Gunningham for his
insightful comments on a draft and Laura Kotevska for editing a draft. I would also like to thank the editors at
Law and Policy for their very helpful comments as well as those of the two anonymous reviewers.
  Address correspondence to: Jeremy Moss, University of New South Wales, Practical Justice Initiative,
Morven Brown Building, High St., Kensington, Sydney 2052, Australia. Telephone: 61 (2) 93852357; E-mail: j.
moss@unsw.edu.au.

LAW  & POLICY,  Vol. 39, No. 4, October 2017                                 ISSN 0265-8240
© 2017 The Author
Law & Policy D 2017 The University of Denver/Colorado Seminary
doi: 10.1111/lapo.12088

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most