About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

27 Jury Expert 7 (2015)
Does Deposition Video Camera Angle Affect Witness Credibility

handle is hein.journals/jurexp27 and id is 41 raw text is: 






























      Does Deposition Video Camera

    Angle Affect Witness Credibility:

by Chris Dominic, Jeffrey W. Jarman, Ph.D., Jonathan M. Lytle, Ph.D.


Introduction

   OME TIME AGO, we (a group of jury consultants) were de-
     bating whether or not it increased a witness's credibility
     to have the video camera used in the deposition aimed
directly at the witness or to the side at an angle. After all, this
was a question we got from clients from time to time. The
argument for putting the camera directly on the witness was
that the viewer got direct eye contact and the look and feel
was similar to something you would see on a television news
program. Newscasters look straight ahead and speak to their
audience by looking directly at the camera. The concern about
this strategy was that it seemed too intentional. The witness
would appear to be an advocate, thus decreasing their cred-
ibility. The argument for putting the camera off to the side
was that it appeared more natural, and thus, it would bolster
the witness's credibility. Unfortunately, the diagonal angle did
not have the benefit of the perceived eye contact between the
witness and the viewer. This left us wondering, where should
the camera be positioned to maximize witness credibility in a
videotaped deposition?

The importance of speaker credibility to the process of persua-


sion has been documented as far back as the ancient Greeks.
As Aristotle noted, credibility may almost be called the most
effective means of persuasion (1941, p. 1329). While scholars
differ on the precise dimensions of credibility (elements such
expertise, charisma, and trustworthiness), decades of research
has confirmed its importance for persuasion. Historically, cred-
ibility was conceptualized as a source characteristic-an indi-
vidual speaker had varying degrees of credibility based on their
qualities. Recent efforts have shifted away from a source-based
view of credibility and focused instead on a receiver-based view
of credibility. There is now strong support for the idea that
credibility is a perception held by the receiver (Stiff, 2003, p.
107).

An important aspect of the perception of credibility relates to
the eye contact of the speaker. A long line of research has estab-
lished the importance of eye contact for the perception of cred-
ibility. Beebe (1974) documented increasing amounts of eye
contact resulted in increasing amounts of credibility. Similarly,
Burgoon, Coker and Coker (1986) found gaze aversion car-
ries generally negative relational connotations (p. 518). The
link between eye contact and credibility has a direct effect on


May 2015 - Volume 27, Issue 2


thejuryex(pert.com  7

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most