About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2012 Jura: A Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem Allam- es Jogtudomanyi Karanak Tudomanyos Lapja 82 (2012)
"Moderate Conservative" Notion and Policy in Turkey

handle is hein.journals/jura2012 and id is 82 raw text is: Assoc. Prof M. Qagatay Okutan: Moderate Conservative Notion and Policy in Turkey

Assoc. Prof. M. agatay Okutan
Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of economics
and administrative sciences Department of public admi-
nistaration
Trabzon/TURKEY
Moderate Conservative
Notion and Policy in Turkey
Conservatism is a notion used abundantly with
adjectives before it and in this regard, it doesn't
have a privilege in Turkey. The variety of the mean-
ings given to the concept without doubt, is a result
of the idea that it is not right to explain the notion
of conservatism with universal principles; in other
words, the apathy towards the concept of ideology,
and as its extension, is a result of various historical
practices that would be the basis for each country's
conservatism. Although this enriches the theoretical
studies literature, also causes a severe conceptual
chaos. Thus, one has to consider the conceptual am-
biguity for a discussion based on Turkey or consider
that the subject must be limited to its one or a few
dimensions.
1. Which Conservatism?
(In Theory and in Turkey)
Considering conservatism as a notion developed by
the reactions of aristocracy; means to have a stance
against the French Revolution, Enlightenment, liber-
alism, and finally, against bourgeoisie. Indeed, based
on this thesis, S. P. Huntington defines conservatism
as the protectionism of permanent institutions and an
autonomous idea system. Layton, 1982:4). Although
this approach, which can be found in many studies
on conservatism, makes theoretical definitions easy,
it can be misleading in practice. However, when
we think about the fact that conservatism does not
propose a universal political model, it would not be
right to tell that a stance against liberalism would be
come prominent in every case. L. Kdker states that
the reaction against liberalism has an important place
in the historical development of conservatism but
also states that it does not occur on the same level
in all countries.1
There is no doubt that conservatism had sub-
stantially improved as a reaction against the French

revolution. However, it must be noted that reaction
against the revolution shows itself in two different
ways. B. B. Ozipek, makes a distinction between the
Continental Europe and Anglo-American world.

Alongside the reactionary conservatism of the
Continental Europe that praises pre-revolution in all
of its aspects, there is also the Anglo-American type
moderate conservatism.2 The first idea was led by
Maistre, and the second by Burke.
It can be said that within time, the reactionary
type of Conservatism accepted the idea of change. In
this regard, it wouldn't be right to say that conserva-
tism represents a stance against all kinds of change.
This is a result of the dominance of the moderate
type of conservatism until today. So, if we have to
state with the accurate evaluation of Ozipek; although
conservatism has a significant distrust against the
unknown, it is not the same with reaction, which
represents a stance against change in all situations.3
The most effective sentence, giving a meaning
to this distinction, belongs to Burke: change is
the means of our preservation. In his book Reflec-
tions, Burke has established the main principles of
conservatism and this has maintained its effects
until today. Accordingly; value given to religion and
history, and the concern that reforms would bring
injustice against individuals, importance of private
property and the conception of society as a living
organism come forward as the main foundations of
Burke conservatism.4
It is possible to assess Turkish conservatism
based on the principles established by Burke, the
pioneer of Anglo-American conservatism. In this
regard, it is useful to examine the similarities of the
said conservatism and the conservatism embodied
in Turkey. This examination is also important for
giving a meaning to the current political trends and
the practices of the parties in power in Turkey. It
should be immediately noted that the scope of this
study will be limited to the stance of conservatism
against religion and change.
Another issue to be stated beforehand at this stage
is that it is possible to assess Turkish conservatism
from many different angles, as stated above. The
preference of researching the similarities between
Anglo-American conservatism comes from its func-
tionality for understanding the political develop-
ments and government practices. In other words, the
moderate theme dominant in Turkish conserva-
tism is essential in its key function in assessing the
Turkish political life and it should be taken as the
meeting point of theory and practicality.
2. On Turkish Conservatism between

the Old and the New, or on Change
The process of modernization in Turkey can be traced
to the last century of the Ottoman Empire. Without

JURA 2012/1.

82

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most