About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

43 J. Sup. Ct. Hist. 237 (2018)
Bank of the United States v. Deveaux and the Birth of Constitutional Rights for Corporations

handle is hein.journals/jspcth43 and id is 243 raw text is: 














Bank of the United States


v. Deveaux and the


Birth of Constitutional Rights


for Corporations


ADAM WINKLER


              Introduction

    Recent decisions by the Supreme Court
of the United States in Citizens United v.
Federal Election Commission, holding that
corporations have a First Amendment right to
spend money   to influence elections, and
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., permit-
ting corporations to assert religious liberty
rights under a federal law, have brought
the issue of rights for corporations into the
public consciousness. The rise of corporate
constitutional rights is usually traced to an
1886 case, Santa Clara County v. Southern
Pacific Railroad, which is often cited for
establishing that corporations are persons
under the Constitution. While the story of the
Southern Pacific's case is highly entertaining
-involving   an  illustrious lawyer who
deceived the  Justices and a  misleading
headnote that claimed the Court had decided


issues it had not-Santa Clara County was
hardly the first Supreme Court case to address
the constitutional rights of corporations. That
honor belongs to another case decided almost
eighty years earlier, Bank ofthe United States
v. Deveaux, and corporate personhood played
little role.'
    Although still cited from time to time for
other issues, Bank of the United States v.
Deveaux is one of the neglected landmarks of
American  constitutional law. The explicit
question addressed in the case was whether
business corporations had  constitutional
protections-namely, the right to sue in
federal court on grounds of diversity under
Article III. While there is little evidence the
Framers ever intended the Constitution to
apply to business entities, Chief Justice John
Marshall's opinion for the Court broadly
construed the text to cover corporations.
Marshall did not say that corporations were

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most