About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

2014 J. S. Afr. L. 879 (2014)
Who Guards the Guardians - Liability for Breach of Contract

handle is hein.journals/jsouafl2014 and id is 898 raw text is: WHO GUARDS THE GUARDIANS?

'n nuwe artikel 163(1A) ingevoeg wat bepaal dat die toepaslike minister vereistes en
standaarde kan voorskryf vir die opleiding van werknemers en verteenwoordigers
deur kredietgewers, skuldberaders en betalingsverspreidingsagente. Dit is nie 'n
maklike taak om verteenwoordigers en werknemers op te lei nie, hetsy intern of
tydens voorgeskrewe programme nie. Immers, praktisyns, geleerde regskrywers
en ervare regsprekers verskil oor sekere aspekte van die toepassingsgebied van
die Nasionale Kredietwet. Dit blyk uit talle geskrifte en uitsprake. Maar dit is nie
'n onbegonne taak om werknemers te leer watter kontrakte beslis nie binne die
kader van die wet val nie en dat hulle katvoet moet loop vir sulke uitsluitings. 'n
Ooglopende geval waarvoor hulle op die uitkyk moet wees, is groot kontrakte wat
deur regspersone gesluit word.
Wat seker is, is dat die laaste woord oor die aangeleenthede wat hier aan die
orde gestel is, nog nie gespreek is nie en dat kredietgewers hulle kontrakte weer
grondig sal moet hersien. In besonder sal hulle moet seker maak of hulle regtig wil
h die Nasionale Kredietwet moet op die verbintenisse wat daaruit voortspruit van
toepassing wees al dan nie indien die wet nie uit eie krag van toepassing is nie. My
raaiskoot is dat hulle kontrakte wat verwysings na die Nasionale Kredietwet bevat
wat nie nodig is nie gaan wysig deur sulke verwysings te skrap. Totdat dit gebeur,
gaan daar nog talle bestaande kontrakte in omloop wees wat aan die twee uitsprake
wat hierbo bespreek is, getoets sal moet word.
JM OTTO
Universiteit van Johannesburg
WHO GUARDS THE GUARDIANS? LIABILITY FOR BREACH OF
CONTRACT
Loureiro v ilivula Quality Protection (Pty) Ltd (09/15228) [2011] ZAGPJHC 140
(30 Sept 2011)
ilivula Quality Protection (Pty) Ltd v Loureiro 2013 3 SA 407 (SCA)
Loureiro v ilivula Quality Protection (Pty) Ltd 2014 3 SA 394 (CC)
1 Introduction
The matter of Loureiro v ilivula Quality Protection (Pty) Ltd (2014 3 SA 394 (CC))
dealt with the vexed question of liability where a security service provider had
apparently failed to prevent a house invasion and robbery from taking place. It is
one of those cases where the same facts apparently gave rise to claims for breach
of contract and in delict. Firstly, the court had to decide whether a security service
provider could be liable for breach of contract towards its client where a house
invasion and robbery took place while the property was under protection of the
security service provider. Secondly, the court also had to decide whether a security
service provider could be liable in delict towards third parties who were caught up
in the house invasion and robbery that took place while the property was under
protection of the security service provider. While the action involved both claims

TSAR 2014.4

[ISSN 0257 - 7747]

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most