2009 Jotwell: J. Things We Like [1] (2009)

handle is hein.journals/jotwell2009 and id is 1 raw text is: 



Exposing Criminal Procedure's Hidden History
http://crim.jotwell.com/exposing-criminal-procedures-hidden-history/
David Alan Sklansky, One Train May Hide Another: Katz, Stonewall, and the Secret Subtext of Criminal
Procedure, 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 875 (2008).










Jack Chin


David Alan Sklansky offers fascinating new insights into an old chestnut, Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347
(1967). Katz is a worthy subject, because its rejection of the trespass test for searches in favor of the
reasonable expectation of privacy framework apparently heralded a new scope for the Fourth Amendment.
The specific holding of Katz, that wiretapping constituted a search, overruled prior law and survives today. Yet,
as the cases after Katz developed, from open fields to wired informants, the results of the new test were the
same as the old test.

Together, the great criminal procedure cases of the Warren Court read like a parade of vice straight out of Guys
and Dolls: The possession of dirty paperbacks at issue in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), the incipient stick-
up artists of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), the Chinese opium dealers in Wong Sun v. United States, 371
U.S. 471 (1963), the bookmaker in Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 (1969), and the L.A. bookie in Katz
itself. Sklansky proposes that with Katz, at least, this image is wrong; Katz was not only about bets and
telephone booths. The secret subtext of Katz was protection of gay men from police surveillance in public
restroom stalls. Sklansky advances a powerful circumstantial case that both pre-Katz jurisprudence involving
gay men and the cultural context of morals policing of males might well have influenced the Court's decision.

Remarkably, the phrase reasonable expectation of privacy originated in arguments that the police should not
spy on men in bathroom stalls. In a 1966 special project, the UCLA Law Review published an empirical study
of arrests for consensual sodomy in California. More than half were made in public restrooms. Most were for
sexual conduct directly witnessed by the arresting officers, typically, it seems, from hidden observation posts.
Sklansky, supra, at 887. The study criticized toilet surveillance, arguing that the Fourth Amendment should
protect 'reasonable expectations of privacy' in 'semi-public places.' Id. at 894.

The study built on ongoing litigation in California employing the same phraseology. In 1962, a pair of
California Supreme Court decisions held that the police could not observe people in closed bathroom stalls from
hidden vantage points. In a case involving Park Rangers observing men in bathrooms at Yosemite, the Ninth
Circuit disagreed. Smayda v. United States, 352 F.2d 251 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 981 (1966).
However,  Judge Browning's dissent contended that the evidence had to be suppressed because defendants had a
reasonable expectation of partial privacy. Id. at 260.

The UCLA   report was noticed; for example, Look Magazine discussed it in a 1967 an article on The sad 'gay'
life. Similarly, while the Court ultimately denied certiorari in Smayda in spite of the conflicting decisions,
Sklansky shows that it was not a routine rejection. Justice Douglas voted to take the case, and clerks for Clark

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 2,700 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Access to this content requires a subscription. Please visit the following page to request a quote or trial:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?