About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

17 J. Democracy 132 (2006)
What Really Happened in Kyrgyzstan?

handle is hein.journals/jnlodmcy17 and id is 316 raw text is: 








    WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IN

                  KYRGYZSTAN?

                         Scott Radnitz






Scott Radnitz is a doctoral candidate in political science at the Massa-
chusetts Institute of Technology. His articles have been published in
Demokratizatsiya and Regional and Federal Studies. He is writing his
dissertation on networks, mobilization, and the state in Central Asia.


It is said that when something happens once it is an accident, twice a
coincidence, and a third time a pattern. Many doubted that any country
in Central Asia would become part of a pattern of people power revo-
lutions spreading throughout the former Soviet Union. Yet when protests
over flawed parliamentary elections forced Kyrgyz president Askar
Akayev  to flee to Moscow on 24 March 2005, he left in his wake the
first peaceful-albeit initially extraconstitutional-transfer of power
that the five countries of what used to be Soviet Central Asia have seen
in a decade and a half of independence. Kyrgyzstan subsequently held
a presidential election deemed free and fair by international observers,
in which Kurmanbek  Bakiyev, former prime minister and one of the
uprising's leaders, won 89.5 percent of the vote. A period of euphoria
quickly gave way to the messy task of governing.
   Pundits quickly drew comparisons to the regime changes in Georgia
and Ukraine, dubbing  the Kyrgyz events the Tulip Revolution to
parallel the Rose and Orange varieties. While these comparisons
may  have been overstated, the events of March 2005 and their pointed
lesson that no given autocratic regime need be taken as permanent did
offer Central Asians a reasonable measure of renewed hope that democ-
racy might have a chance to develop in their countries.
   That said, the change in Kyrgyzstan had its own dynamics, and these
continue to shape it. The forces that drove the Tulip Revolution-inde-
pendent  business  interests, informal networks,  and patronage
ties-developed under Akayev's 15-year rule, and remained strong af-
ter his exit. This helps to explain why Kyrgyzstan has had a putative
revolution that in fact has been notable more for continuity than for

          Journal of Democracy Volume 17, Number 2 April 2006
© 2006 National Endowment for Democracy and The Johns Hopkins University Press

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most