About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

19 J. Int'l Bus. & L. 50 (2019-2020)
Nash Bargaining Solution and Its Generalizations in Intellectual Property Litigation: VirnetX and an Analysis of the Court's Decision

handle is hein.journals/jibla19 and id is 58 raw text is: 








NASH BARGAINING SOLUTION AND ITS GENERALIZATIONS
  IN  INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LITIGATION: VIRNETX AND
              AN   ANALYSIS OF THE COURT'S DECISION

                         Professor Rajeev R. Bhattacharya, Ph.D.

                            Washington Finance and Economics

                                            at

                                Johns Hopkins  University*

                             RRB@Washington-Finance.com

                                    I.   ABSTRACT

         The  purpose  of this article is to explain the Nash Bargaining Solution and its
generalizations, especially in the presence of asymmetric bargaining power.  The  article
discusses the pros and cons in the context of intellectual property litigation. Furthermore, it
provides  a description and detailed analysis of the Court's decision in VirnetX from this
perspective.


         KEYWORDS: Nash Bargaining Solution - Generalizations - Asymmetric
         Bargaining Power  - Intellectual Property - Litigation - VirnetX

                                II.    INTRODUCTION

         This  paper discusses the Nash  Bargaining  Solution, as initially posited by the
legendary  Nobel  Laureate John  Nash,', arguably the  father of modem   economics, and
generalized by  John Harsanyi,2 Reinhard  Selten,3 Lloyd Shapley,4 Ehud  Kalai and Meir


* Mailing address: Mailing address: Professor Rajeev Bhattacharya, Johns Hopkins University, 1717
Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, DC 20036., U.S.A. I acknowledge, with gratitude, the very helpful
comments from John Greenberg; the usual caveats apply. I have not received any substantial funding for this
research and have no conflicts of interest.
  John Nash, The Bargaining Problem, 18 ECONOMETRICA 155, (1950); John Nash, Two Person Cooperative
Games,  21   ECONOMETRICA   128,  (1953); Press Release, NOBELPRIZE.ORG  (Oct. 11, 1994)
bttp://www.nobelprize.org/nobel prizes/economic-sciences/laureates/1994/press.html (Professor Nash was
awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1994).
2 See John C. Harsanyi, A Bargaining Model for the Cooperative n-Person Game, 4 INT'L ECON. R. 194
(1959).     See      generally    John      Harsanyi,    Biographical,    NOBELPRIZE.ORG
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1994/harsanyilfacts/ (last visited Feb. 28, 2020)
(Professor Harsanyi was awarded the Nobel Prize in economics in 1994).
  See Reinhard Selten, Valuation of n-Person Games, 52 ANNALS OF MATHEMATIC STuD. 577 (1964); See
generally Reinhard  Selten, Facts,  NOBELPRIZE.ORG   https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-
sciences/1994/selten/facts/ (last visited Feb. 28, 2020)( Professor Selten was awarded the Nobel Prize in
economics in 1994).


50

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most