About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

24 J.C. & U.L. 97 (1997-1998)
Applying the Power of Association on Campus: A Model Code of Academic Integrity

handle is hein.journals/jcolunly24 and id is 107 raw text is: APPLYING THE POWER OF ASSOCIATION ON
CAMPUS: A MODEL CODE OF ACADEMIC
INTEGRITY
GARY PAVELA*
INTRODUCTION
Institutions of higher education are paying renewed attention to the
importance of academic integrity and the value of traditional honor codes.'
Reasons for this development include an apparent increase in academic
dishonesty by undergraduate students; the withdrawal of some faculty
members from the full scope of responsibilities traditionally associated with
teaching and mentoring students; the need for a shared set of values to
revitalize a sense of community on campus; and the expansion of student
autonomy as the exercise of disciplinary authority in loco parentis wanes.
The Model Code that follows is designed to assist college administrators and
lawyers in developing academic integrity policies that can accommodate
these trends, and the new collegiate environment coming with them.
I. ACADEMIC DISHONESTY IS PERVASIVE, AND BECOMING WORSE
The most extensive recent research on college student and faculty
attitudes toward academic dishonesty has been done by Professor Donald
L. McCabe at the Graduate School of Management at Rutgers University.2
* Director of Judicial Programs, University of Maryland at College Park. Editor, SYNTHESIS:
LAW AND POLICY IN HIGHER EDUCATION and SYNFAX WEEKLY REPORT. Past President, National
Center for Academic Integrity.
Portions of this article draw upon the author's previous writing related to student
development and academic integrity, including the 1996 National Association of Student
Personnel Administrators (NASPA) White Paper: GARY PAVELA, THE POWER OF ASSOCIATION:
DEFINING OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH STUDENTS IN THE 21ST CENTURY (1996) [hereinafter DEFINING];
GARY PAVELA, Academic Integrity and Student Development, MONOGRAPH (1988); and related
articles in SYNTHESIS: LAW AND POLICY IN HIGHER EDUCATION and SYNFAx WEEKLY REPORT.
1. See Gary Pavela & Donald L. McCabe, The Surprising Return of Honor Codes, PLANNING
FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (Summer 1993). Schools adopting some kind of honor code in recent
years include the University of Maryland at College Park, Georgia Tech, and George Washington
University. The clearest evidence of heightened national interest in issues related to academic
integrity was the creation of the National Center for Academic Integrity in 1992. The Center is
a consortium of over 100 colleges and universities that collaborate on academic integrity
policies and procedures. Further information is available at <http'//www.nwu.edu/vacc/ca/>.
2. See Donald L. McCabe & Linda Klebe Trevino, Academic Dishonesty: Honor Codes and
Other Contextual Influences, 64 J. HIGHER EDUC. 522 (1993) [hereinafter Academic Dishonesty];
Donald L. McCabe, Academic Integrity: What the Latest Research Shows, 5 SYNTHESIS 340 (1993)
[hereinafter Academic Integrity].

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most