About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

35 Immigr. & Nat'lity L. Rev. 759 (2014)
Removal of Adequacy: Appellate Review of Mixed Questions in Discretionary Removals

handle is hein.journals/inlr35 and id is 773 raw text is: 







COMMENT


     REMOVAL OF ADEQUACY: APPELLATE REVIEW OF MIXED
             QUESTIONS IN DISCRETIONARY REMOVALS

                            Terry Cannon*


                            I. INTRODUCTION
    The question of whether appellate courts may consider mixed questions
of law and fact that arise out of petitions to review removal orders of aliens
has been problematic for the circuits that have attempted to resolve it. While
8 U.S.C. §  1252(a)(2)(D)1 preserves appellate court jurisdiction to review
denials of discretionary relief if the cases present constitutional claims or
questions of law, federal circuit courts have interpreted questions of law
very differently.
    This article seeks to explain the  circuit split that exists over the
questions of law requirement and the various interpretations of that phrase
that determine whether appellate courts may review mixed questions of law
and fact, as well as understanding why mixed questions require a specific
interpretation in the immigration context. Part II explains mixed questions of
law, the statutory limitations of review, the potential constitutional problems
with the jurisdiction-stripping provision of § 1252 as it existed in the latter
part of the 1990s, and the Supreme Court's decision in INS v. St. Cyr2 that
prompted  Congress to amend  it. Part III examines the current practices of
the circuit courts since the implementation of § 1252(a)(2)(D), finding that
as of 2015, the Seventh Circuit stands alone in its strict interpretation that §
1252(a)(2)(D) precludes review of mixed questions of law and fact. Finally,
Part IV  provides further discussion of the Second  and  Ninth Circuits'
interpretations, both of which conclude that mixed questions are reviewable.


    * Associate Member, 2014-2015 Immigration and Nationality Law Review.
    '8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) codifies REAL ID Act of 2005 § 106(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Courts sometimes refer to this provision simply as REAL ID or Section 106,
Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 § 242(a)(2)(D). To be consistent with
references used in recent court decisions, I will refer to the provision in question as
§ 1252(a)(2)(D).
    2INSv. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001).


759

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing nearly 3,000 academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline with pricing starting as low as $29.95

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most