About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

35 Immigr. & Nat'lity L. Rev. 385 (2014)
Immigration Detention as Punishment

handle is hein.journals/inlr35 and id is 399 raw text is: 385 Immigration Detention as Punishment C6sar Cuauht6moc Garca Hernandez ABSTRACT Courts and commentators have long assumed, without significant analysis, that immigration detention is a form of civil confinement merely because the immigration proceedings of which it is part are deemed civil. This Article challenges that deeply held assumption. It harnesses the U.S. Supreme Court's instruction that detention's civil or penal character turns on legislative intent and, buttressed by theoretical understandings of punishment, contends that immigration detention-apart from the deportation that often results-itself constitutes penal incarceration. In particular, legislation enacted over roughly fifteen years in the 1980s and 1990s indicates a palpable desire to wield immigration detention as a tool in fighting the nation's burgeoning war on drugs by penalizing and stigmatizing criminal behavior. Indeed, the modern immigration detention system has accomplished the U.S. Congress's punitive goal: Immigration detention is a severely unpleasant experience and immigration detainees are viewed as dangerous. In order to remain true to the Court's guidance to draw formal boundaries between civil and penal confinement, the current immigration detention regime should be conceptualized as punishment. This Article contends that the constitutional limitations imposed by criminal procedure are ill-equipped to address immigration detention. Instead, policymakers should learn from the nation's failed experience with mass penal incarceration-and step back from immigration detention's punitive origins to create a truly civil immigration detention system. AUTHOR C6sar Cuauht6moc Garcia Hernindez is a Visiting Professor at the University of Denver Sturm College of Law, publisher of crlmmigration.com, and an Associate Professor at Capital University Law School. This Article benefited from feedback on these ideas from Kif Augustine-Adams, Jennifer Chacdn, Alan Chen, Nora Demleitner, Ingrid Eagly, Nancy Ehrenreich, Ian Farrell, Geoffrey Heeren, David Koelsch, Christopher Lasch, Stephen Lee, Nancy Leong, Hiroshi Motomura, Carolina Nufiez, and Allison Tirres. I am especially indebted to Tamikka Pate for her excellent research assistance. 61 UCLA L REV. 1346 (2014) Originally published in 61 UCLA L. REv. 1346 (2014). Used by pennission.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most