About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

68 Ind. L. J. 1209 (1992-1993)
Science and Ethics in Conducting, Analyzing, and Reporting Social Science Research: Implications for Social Scientists, Judges, and Lawyers

handle is hein.journals/indana68 and id is 1221 raw text is: Science and Ethics in Conducting, Analyzing, and
Reporting Social Science Research: Implications
for Social Scientists, Judges, and Lawyers
ROBERT ROSENTHAL*
PETER DAVID BLANCK*
INTRODUCTION
This Article describes a number of scientific, ethical, and legal issues
relevant to conducting, analyzing, and reporting social science research. Legal
literature has devoted little attention to examining the scientific and ethical
issues in evaluating empirical social science research. This is particularly
troubling in light of the fact that empirical research is presented with
increasing regularity to judges and juries as trial evidence.'
There is a strong relationship between the ethics, the scientific quality, and
the evidentiary importance of the way social science research is conducted,
analyzed, and reported. Everything else being equal, social science research
of higher scientific quality is likely to be more ethically defensible and more
relevant to the resolution of a legal dispute. The higher the quality of the
research program, the better invested has been the time of the research
participants, the funds of the granting agency, and the space of the journals
that report the results, as well as the general investment that a legal fact
finder (that is, a judge or jury) has made in evaluating the importance of the
* Professor of Social Psychology, Harvard University. Ph.D., 1956, UCLA. Robert Rosenthal's
preparation of this Article was supported in part by the Spencer Foundation.
** Professor of Law, University of Iowa College of Law; Senior Fellow, The Annenberg
Washington Program. Ph.D., 1982, Harvard University; LD., 1986, Stanford University. The authors
thank Michael Saks for his comments on earlier drafts of this Article. Peter David Blanck's preparation
of this Article was supported in part by The Annenberg Washington Program.
1. See, e.g., Linda Greenhouse, Court Hears Case on Science RulesN.Y. TIMEs, Mar. 31, 1993,
at AI9 (reporting U.S. Supreme Court's difficulty in deciding when scientific theory is sound enough
to be admitted into evidence when it heard oral arguments in Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., No. 92-102 (U.S. argued Mar. 30, 1993)); Communicating with Juries, Panel One: Judge-Jury
Communications: Improving Communications and Understanding Bias, The Annenberg Washington
Program Conference, April 10, 1992, 68 IND. L.L 1037, 1042 (1993) (statement of Robert Rosenthal)
(cautioning against accepting results of one study without looking at results of similar studies).
For examples of discussions of the legal relevance of research methodology and ethics, see JOHN
MONAHAN & LAURENS WALKER, SOCIAL SCIENCE IN LAW (1989); Peter D. Blanck, Empirical Study
of the Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Methods, Preliminary Findings,
and Implications, 22 N.M. L. REV. 119 (1992); Peter D. Blanck, On Integrating Persons with Mental
Retardation: The ADA and ADR, 22 N.M. L. Rv. 259 (1992); Peter D. Blanck, The Emerging Work
Force: Empirical Study of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 16 J. CORP. L. 693 (1991).

1209

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most