About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

103 Iowa L. Rev. 303 (2017-2018)
The Need for Transparency in the Age of Predictive Sentencing Algorithms

handle is hein.journals/ilr103 and id is 311 raw text is: The Need for Transparency in the Age of Predictive Sentencing Algorithms Alyssa M. Carlson* ABSTRACT: Criminal law scholars devote substantial research to sociological and behavioral studies to determine characteristics common among reoffenders. This research aligns with a massive effort to reform the criminal justice system by reducing recidivism as a means to cure high crime rates and overcrowded prisons. Many scholars believe that by focusing resources on the criminal population that will likely commit future crimes, overall crime rates will decrease. The effort to reduce recidivism has led to the creation of objective risk assessment tools. These are essentially algorithms that purport to predict the likelihood that an individual will commit crime in the future. While these predictive algorithms were first implemented to determine parole conditions, they have become increasingly popular among courts and are now routinely used in all phases of a criminal proceeding. As the demand for predictive risk assessment formulas increases, many state governments now look to private companies to develop these methods. However, the move towards privatization raises issues of transparency, as companies are able to maintain the secrecy of their algorithms by claiming trade secret protection. As a result, defendants are unable to ensure the accuracy of the risk score results. This Note argues that private companies who benefit by providing a public service should be held to the same transparency requirements as public agencies, and freedom of information disclosure requirements should be extended to include proprietary predictive algorithms to achieve this result. 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 304 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................... 307 A. RISK ASSESSMENT AS A RESPONSE TO AN OVERBURDENED JUSTICE SYSTEM ...................................................................... 30 7 J.D. Candidate, The University of Iowa College of Law, 2018; B.A., The University of Iowa, 2013. I would like to thank Professor Sarah Seo for encouraging me to write on this topic. Thank you also to the members of the Iowa Law Review for their hard work during the editing process, especially Courtney Brokloff, Nicholas Huffmon, and Lindsay Moulton. Finally, a special thanks to Rich and MaryJo Parrino, who have been a tremendous source of advice and support throughout law school.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most