About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

23 Indus. L.J. (Juta) 670 (2002)
Judgement on Section 7(2) of the Employment Equity Act Creates Uncertainty regarding HIV Testing in the Workplace

handle is hein.journals/iljuta23 and id is 712 raw text is: Judgment on Section 7(2) of the
Employment Equity Act Creates
Uncertainty regarding HIV Testing
in the Workplace
MARK HEYwooJ*
JENNIFFR JONI**
On 22 January 2002, the Labour Court handed down its first com-
prehensive judgment on HIV testing in the workplace.' The order was
made following an application by Joy Mining Machinery for permis-
sion to conduct voluntary HIV testing of 800 employees to determine
the prevalence of HIV infection in the workplace, 'so as to be better
able to deal with the pandemic'.2 While the judgment is welcome in
that it gives substantive reasons for granting permission for HIV test-
ing in the workplace, it raises serious concerns relating to the extent to
which s 7(2) of the Employment Equity Act (EEA)3 prohibits such
testing. In particular, it raises the question whether the prohibition
extends to all forms of HIV testing, including voluntary testing and
anonymous testing for the purposes of unlinked prevalence surveys.4
THE PROHIBITION ON HIV TESTING IN THE WORKPLACE
The EEA is the First South African law expressly protecting the
rights of people living with HIV/AIDS.             In the context of labour
* BA (Hous) (Oxtord): lead, AIDS Law Project, Ceutre Cbr Applied Legal Studies,
University of the Witwatersrand.
** B Proc (Fort Hare) LLB (Wits): Attorney, AIDS Law Project, Centre for Applied Legal
Studies, University of the Witwatersrand.
We wish to thank Jonathan Berger a researcher of the AIDS Law Project for his valuable
contributions and assistance with the final draft of this article.
1IJo' Xlinitig Machiiiri, A Diiisiou of Hariisctt fer (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Natiomal t 1tion of
Metalwiorkers of SA & others (Joy Mieifg Machitery) (2002) 23 JLJ 391 (LC). The judgient saw
Landman J authorizing mIV testing as well as attaching a number of conditions to its
authorization.
i t para 4.
3 Act 55 of 1998,
4 A standard HIV test (known as the ELISA test) usually in volves drawing blood or saliva and
detects the presence of antibodies to HIV. The presence of antibodies indicates the presence of
HIV infection. An HIV prevalcnc sircy involves the testing of a group of individuals to
determine the percentage of those infected anxongst the group.
Section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996, which prohibits untair
discrimination, does not expressly mention HIV status. Nevertheless. when the Constitutional
Court was called upon to adjudicate a challenge against unfair discrimination on the basis ofttIV
status, a unanimous court held that untirly discriminaring against an enployee on the basis of his
or her HIV status amounts to a violation of tleir right to dignity, being tantamxount to 'econoomic
death' (mffiman- u, SA Airuays (Pty) Ltd 2001 (1) SA I (CC); (2000) 21 ILJ 2357 (CC)).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most