About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

39 Harv. Women's L.J. 1 (2016)
Just Leave

handle is hein.journals/hwlj39 and id is 7 raw text is: JUST LEAVE CATHERINE ALBISTON* & LINDSEY TRIMBLE O'CONNOR The story of work and family conflict is a story of social change. In the last three decades, millions of American workers have moved into precari- ous jobs, and most of these jobs lack benefits such as sick days, vacation, or family leave. Forty percent of the American workforce now works in non- standard, contingent, or precarious jobs. At the same time, more families now depend upon a single parent for both caregiving and financial support, and far fewer families have a full-time caregiver at home. Public policy has not kept pace with these changing social conditions, and as a result working families now face a caregiving crisis. Although federal lawmakers recently proposed paid family leave as a solution, studies of California's similar paid family leave program raise serious questions about whether this solution will work. These studies find that low-wage workers disproportionately do not take family leave even though it is paid, a startling finding because these are the workers who have the greatest economic incentive to use paid family leave. These findings suggest that lost wages are not the only deterrent to taking family leave. This Article documents and explains barriers to using family leave, drawing on original survey data from a statewide representative sample of California workers who needed but did not take paid family leave. It ana- lyzes how workplace practices and interactions dissuade workers from tak- ing family leave even when it is nominally available. We find that these workers forgo leave because they both witness and experience retaliation at work for taking family leave. Their employers use gendered conceptions of work and family to justify this retaliation and to frame work-family conflict as a private, personal issue, rather than the product of changing work de- mands and social conditions. Employers continue to expect workers to be as available and dedicated as the outdated industrial-era male breadwinner with a stay-at-home wife, even when those employers no longer provide good wages, secure employment, or regular hours in return. Employers draw on work and family norms of the past to justify retaliation for taking leave and to extend their control over workers. Because care responsibilities dispropor- * Professor of Law and Sociology, University of California, Berkeley. The authors thank Kathy Abrams, Tristin Green, Elizabeth Kristen, Kristin Luker, Joy Milligan, Me- lissa Murray, Karen Tani, Mariam Tangherlini, Sharon Terman, and Rory Van Loo for their helpful comments on this manuscript. The authors also wish to express deep grati- tude to Ruth Milkman for sharing the Golden Omnibus Survey data with us. The authors thank the Michelle R. Clayman Institute for Gender Research at Stanford University for sponsoring the Redesigning and Redefining Work initiative that generated our collabora- tion. Finally, many thanks to Abigail Stepnitz for providing invaluable research assis- tance on this article. tAssistant Professor of Sociology, California State University, Channel Islands.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most