About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

30 Health Law. 12 (2017-2018)
The Price Is Right: What Is Usual, Customary and Reasonable between Provider and Payer

handle is hein.journals/healaw30 and id is 140 raw text is: 

THE PRICE IS RIGHT? WHAT IS USUAL, CUSTOMARY

AND REASONABLE BETWEEN PROVIDER AND PAYOR


By Nina Zhang, Esq.
Stephenson, Acquisto & Colman
Burbank, CA

    In most markets, consumers can
easily determine what they should be
paying for a good  or service. For
example, to buy jeans, consumers can
flip open a catalog or drive to the
nearest mall. They   can compare
prices across brands and at different
stores, and if they do not know why
one pair costs $500 and another costs
$50, they can talk to a sales clerk.
They can further make a note of the
brand of the jeans; then, when they
arrive home, they can research the
brand on the Internet to understand
what they are paying for.

    Healthcare is not like that. The
market price is not visible, and con-
sumers cannot readily access it or com-
pare it across providers.1 People rely on
their health insurer to negotiate prices
with contracted providers, creating a
network of participating providers. But
often people receive care out of net-
work from a noncontracted provider,
such as when they need a specific pro-
cedure, see a certain doctor and most
frequently, when they must go to the
nearest emergency room. When care is
obtained out of network, patients are
frequently unaware of the fact that
the prices have not been determined
ahead of time and that providers and
payors rely on a murky rule, i.e. what is
the usual, customary, and reasonable,
or UCR  rate, to determine the cost
of care. In this age of consumer
directed healthcare and  increased
patient cost sharing, the patients'
share of out of network costs may be
significant. Thus, unless a state prohib-
its balance or surprise billing,2 the dif-
ference between what  the provider
charges and the insurer pays shifts to
the consumer.

    Because UCR  is a standard that
lacks clear guidance, payment disputes


12


often arise between providers and
payors; providers typically want to be
paid their total billed charges,3 while
insurers want to pay substantially less.
Federal law  has historically been
silent as to what the UCR  rate is;
only the federal health insurance
exchange website provides some clari-
fication, stating that usual, custom-
ary and reasonable is the amount
paid for a medical service in a geo-
graphic area based on what providers
in the area usually charge for the
same or similar medical service.4 Pay-
ors and providers, and  sometimes
elected officials, have challenged
what this amount should be.


History   of Usual,
Customary and Reasonable

    The usual, customary and rea-
sonable payment method emerged in
1965 when  the federal government
enacted Medicare and Medicaid and
the United States saw the slow and
steady rise of health insurance. Previ-
ously, patients  paid  physicians
directly; physicians' primary source of
income was what the average patient
paid.6 Concerned  that physicians
would become  locked into a schedule
of fixed fees, the American Medical
Association (AMA)   campaigned
successfully for a new method of pay-
ment  that would allow its physician
members   to retain flexibility and
avoid a fee ceiling.7 Consequently,
Congress developed  and enacted  a
system that mandates payments  on
the basis of the regular (usual) fee of
any physician who the patient cares
to choose (assuming it to be within
the range of customary fees in that
area, or if precedent is lacking, to be
reasonable).' Among private insurers,
in the late 1960s Blue Shield imple-
mented  its own  UCR   program  in
response to the major labor and man-
agement  negotiators of that period


who  wanted complete  coverage for
their members.9

    Unsurprisingly,  new  doctors
started billing insurers at unprece-
dented  levels, lacking a record of
charges, so that their usual fee could
be whatever they chose.10 Seeing that
they could earn more money,  more
experienced doctors followed suit.
Physicians and hospitals, no longer
having to deal directly with patients,
faced little pushback. Consequently,
costs exploded.

    Recognizing that Medicare costs
were spiraling out of control, Congress
and the Reagan administration enacted
an alternative payment system devel-
oped by researchers at Yale University.
Rather  than allowing hospitals to
charge whatever  they wanted, the
new  model paid hospitals a predeter-
mined, set rate based on the patient's
diagnosis and the  average cost of
resources used by all U.S. hospitals,
the diagnosis related group (DRG)
rate. This changed the incentives for
hospitals; previously, the more a hos-
pital did for its patients, the more
money  it received in payments, but
now if a hospital could treat the patient
for less than the DRG rate, it could
keep the difference. Thus, hospitals
had to be concerned about how long a
patient stayed, the tests and procedures
used during the stay, and how much
was paid for the resources used in car-
ing for the patients. This change
helped lower Medicare hospital pay-
ment increases by reducing Medicare
patients' days of care but did not neces-
sarily reduce overall costs.

    The healthcare industry would
later develop additional methods of
controlling costs, such as capitation,
accountable care organizations and
forms of bundling. Yet UCR   rates
remain a vestige of America's initial
payment system and is alive and well
in dealings between providers and


Volume 30, Number 4, April 2018


The Health Lawyer

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most