About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

40 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 407 (2005)
State, Be Not Proud: A Retributivist Defense of the Commutation of Death Row and the Abolition of the Death Penalty

handle is hein.journals/hcrcl40 and id is 413 raw text is: State, Be Not Proud:
A Retributivist Defense of the Commutation of
Death Row and the Abolition of the
Death Penalty
Dan Markel*
In the aftermath of Governor Ryan's decision in 2003 to commute the sen-
tences of each offender on Illinois'death row, various scholars have claimed
that Ryan's action was cruel, callous, a grave injustice, and, from a retributiv-
ist perspective, an unmitigated moral disaster This Article contests that
position, showing not only why a commutation of death row is permitted un-
der principles of retributive justice, but also why it might be required. When
properly understood, retributive justice, in its commitment to moral accountabil-
ity and equal liberty, hinges on modesty and dignity in modes of punishment.
In this vein, retributivism opposes the apparently ineluctable slide towards
ever-harsher punishments in the name of justice. While the thesis I defend is
sited in the particular context of the death penalty, the implications reach more
broadly; the argument offered here signals that a commitment to retributiv-
ism in no way impedes the realization of humane institutions of criminal justice
and a rejection of the benighted, misbegotten, and often brutal status quo we
shamefully permit to endure.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
L  Introduction  ..............................................................................  408
II. What's Wrong with a Blanket Commutation of Death Row? ....... 416
A. An Unlawful Abuse of Power ................................................ 417
B. Improper Reliance upon Mercy ............................................ 418
1. Mercy as Imperfect Obligation ......................................... 418
2.  M ercy  as  Equity  ............................................................... 419
3. The Implications of Mercy for a Blanket Commutation .... 419
C. The Significance of Victim Interests ...................................... 421
D. Moral Desert and Capital Punishment ................................. 422
Assistant Professor, Florida State University College of Law. J.D., Harvard Law School;
M.Phil., University of Cambridge; A.B., Harvard College. I am grateful to Austin Sarat, who
accelerated my thinking on the issues raised here by inviting me to speak on sovereignty
and clemency at the May 2004 Law and Society Conference in Chicago; to several law faculty
workshops; to Annalise Acorn, Josh Berman, Jennifer Collins, Chad Flanders, Steve Garvey,
Sarah Harding, David Hoffman, Orin Kerr, Avery Kolers, Ethan Leib, Wayne Logan, Chris-
tine Magdo, Mary Ann McGrail, Jay Michaelson, Marc Miller, Julian Davis Mortenson,
Chris Park, JJ Prescott, Matt Price, Bo Rutledge, Jonathan Simon, Lloyd Weinreb, Bob Weis-
berg, and Ron Wright for comments and conversations; to Mary McCormick and her col-
leagues in the FSU Law library for wonderful assistance; and to the editors of this journal,
for their patience, diligence, and intellectual engagement. The title is derived from John
Donne's sonnet that begins Death, be not proud. Comments: markel@ post.harvard.edu.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most