About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

55 Hastings L.J. [iii] (2003-2004)
Table of Contents - Issue 1

handle is hein.journals/hastlj55 and id is 3 raw text is: HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 55 2003-2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLES DAUBERT & DANGER: THE FIT OF EXPERT PREDICTIONS IN CIVIL COMMITMENTS A lexander Scherr .............................................................................. I In civil commitments, courts face the task of predicting the dan- gerousness of a mentally ill person and often turn to experts for help. Recently, the reliability of expert predictive testimony has improved; yet the best predictions still fall far short of reasonable certainty. Predictive science itself remains under scrutiny and is the subject of extended research and debate. The modern handling of expert testimony, initiated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., might suggest that courts should exclude such unreliable expertise. The Daubert rules seem to imply a reliability standard under which trial courts should ex- clude expertise that lacks scientific validity. Such a test should require the exclusion of predictive expertise. Yet no appellate court has ever done so; this Article assesses why. This Article reviews Daubert and its progeny, describes the science of prediction, and analyzes how predictive uncertainty af- fects and interacts with civil commitment law. It analyzes judicial decisions on the admissibility of predictions under both Daubert and the alternate Frye standard. From this review, a more complex view of Daubert emerges. In- stead of a test of scientific reliability, Daubert requires courts to weigh the reliability of expertise against its fit to the demands of a given case. Courts may admit even such deeply unreliable expertise as predictive testimony where it bears a sufficiently strong fit to the needs of the case. This Article proposes a meth- odology and an analytical structure with which to assess fit under Daubert, and suggests further directions for both doctrinal and theoretical development of the standard.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most