About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

7 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 1 (2013)
Foreword

handle is hein.journals/harlpolrv7 and id is 1 raw text is: Foreword

Jeanne Charn*
I. CIVIL GIDEON AND LEGAL SERVICES IN AMERICA
This symposium volume of the Harvard Law & Policy Review cele-
brates the fiftieth anniversary of Gideon v. Wainwright,' the landmark Su-
preme Court decision that required states to provide counsel for indigent
defendants in criminal proceedings. It is clear that Gideon continues to have
force and relevance for criminal defendants. Indeed, in 1967, the Supreme
Court extended Gideon to youth defendants,2 and in two decisions last term,
the Court affirmed the right to effective assistance of counsel at the plea
bargain stage.
However, there is no parallel right to counsel in civil matters. The Su-
preme Court has had two opportunities to find a right to counsel in civil
cases of great consequence for the parties involved-a proceeding to termi-
nate a mother's parental rights4 and a civil contempt proceeding for nonpay-
ment of child support in which a father faced prison. In both cases, the
Court found that the defendant had no right to counsel. Civil Gideon efforts
in state courts and legislatures have not fared much better. Progress has
largely been limited to state statutes that primarily focus on proceedings in-
volving intervention in parent-child relations (e.g., the termination of paren-
tal rights or the removal of children from parental care in instances of
neglect or abuse) and proceedings that seek to curtail the freedom or per-
sonal choice of adults (e.g., petitions for civil commitment, involuntary ster-
ilizations, or appointments of substitute decision makers on health or
financial matters).'
While opinions might differ about the present health and future pros-
pects of legal services in the United States, there is scant evidence that the
country is moving towards a civil Gideon. In this regard, the United States,
the largest and wealthiest Western democracy, stands alone among its peers.
Government-funded legal aid programs of many common law countries
(e.g., the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and most Cana-
dian provinces) and civil law countries (e.g., the Netherlands, Germany,
Sweden, Norway, and Finland) guarantee access to an attorney in a wide
* Senior Lecturer on Law, Harvard Law School; Director, Bellow-Sacks Access to Civil
Legal Services Project.
' 372 U.S. 335 (1963).
2 In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
Lafler v. Cooper, 132 S. Ct. 1376 (2012); Missouri v. Frye, 132 S. Ct. 1399 (2012).
4 Lassiter v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 452 U.S. 18 (1981).
Turner v. Rogers, 131 S. Ct. 2507 (2011).
6 See Laura K. Abel & Max Rettig, State Statutes Providing for a Right to Counsel in
Civil Cases, 40 CLEARINGHOUSE REv. 245, 252-70 (2006) (collecting right-to-counsel statutes
across the United States).

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most